: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
data"
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when
> there are data"
>
> Hi Jaehoon
>
> > Did you test on latest u-boot? v2018.01 was too old version.
> >
> Yes
c: CPGS
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
> data"
>
> Dear Andy,
>
> On 5/12/21 7:09 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > Dear Andy
> >
> > On 5/11/21 4:39 PM, andy...@sony.com wrote:
> >> Hi Jaehoon
>
-
>>> From: U-Boot On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:13 PM
>>> To: Peng Fan ; jh80.ch...@gmail.com;
>>> u-boot@lists.denx.de
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
>>> d
gt;> -Original Message-
>> From: U-Boot On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:13 PM
>> To: Peng Fan ; jh80.ch...@gmail.com;
>> u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
>
m: U-Boot On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:13 PM
> To: Peng Fan ; jh80.ch...@gmail.com;
> u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
> data"
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 4/6/21 7:02 PM,
Hi Peng,
On 4/6/21 7:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there
>> are data"
>>
>> Hi Jaehoon
>>
>>> Did you test on latest u-boot? v2018.01 was too old version.
>>>
>> Yes, we
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there
> are data"
>
> Hi Jaehoon
>
> > Did you test on latest u-boot? v2018.01 was too old version.
> >
> Yes, we tested on v2020.04, although there is no such issue, but I think it
Hi Peng,
On 4/6/21 7:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there
>> are data"
>>
>> Hi Jaehoon
>>
>>> Did you test on latest u-boot? v2018.01 was too old version.
>>>
>> Yes, we
U-Boot On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 6:44 AM
To: Mo, Yuezhang ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: peng@nxp.com; c...@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
data"
Hi
On 3/17/21 3:44 PM, yuezhang...@sony.c
ent: Monday, March 22, 2021 6:03 PM
> To: Wu, Andy ; jh80.ch...@samsung.com; Mo, Yuezhang
> ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: peng....@nxp.com; c...@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
> data"
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On
oot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: peng@nxp.com; c...@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: sdhci: set to INT_DATA_END when there are
> data"
>
> Hi
>
> On 3/17/21 3:44 PM, yuezhang...@sony.com wrote:
> > This reverts commit 17ea3c862865c0d704646f67dbf8412f9ff54f
Hi
On 3/17/21 3:44 PM, yuezhang...@sony.com wrote:
> This reverts commit 17ea3c862865c0d704646f67dbf8412f9ff54f59.
>
> In eMMC specification, for the response-with-busy(R1b, R5b)
> command, the DAT0 will driven to LOW as BUSY status, and in
> sdhci specification, the transfer complete bit should
Reviewed-by: Andy Wu
Best Regards
Andy Wu
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot On Behalf Of
> yuezhang...@sony.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:45 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: peng@nxp.com; pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
> Subject: [PATCH] Rever
This reverts commit 17ea3c862865c0d704646f67dbf8412f9ff54f59.
In eMMC specification, for the response-with-busy(R1b, R5b)
command, the DAT0 will driven to LOW as BUSY status, and in
sdhci specification, the transfer complete bit should be wait
for BUSY status de-assert.
All response-with-busy com
14 matches
Mail list logo