On 2/22/24 05:34, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/24 20:30, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/20/24 14:18, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/20/24 19:43, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/20/24 13:24, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/16/24
On 2/20/24 20:30, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/20/24 14:18, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/20/24 19:43, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/20/24 13:24, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24
On 2/20/24 14:18, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/24 19:43, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/20/24 13:24, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/24
On 2/20/24 19:43, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/20/24 13:24, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/15/24
On 2/20/24 13:24, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/15/24
On 2/16/24 17:09, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
Currently,
On 2/16/24 11:03, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Currently,
On 2/16/24 10:06, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
On 2/16/24 14:48, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to
On 2/15/24 20:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to wait
for SPL to initialize RAM before it
On 2/15/24 14:31, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
>>> However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to wait
>>> for SPL to initialize
On 2/15/24 14:08, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
>> However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to wait
>> for SPL to initialize RAM before it can load U-Boot. This can result
On 2/15/24 18:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to wait
for SPL to initialize RAM before it can load U-Boot. This can result in
long waits, since occasionally initializing
Currently, when we boot from JTAG we try to boot U-Boot from RAM.
However, this is a bit tricky to time, since the debugger has to wait
for SPL to initialize RAM before it can load U-Boot. This can result in
long waits, since occasionally initializing RAM (and other things in
psu_init) takes a
14 matches
Mail list logo
