On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> There can certainly be a lot more elements in the "revisions" (and
> "names") arrays than there are gpios used to form the trinary number
> we're searching for; we simply don't know the array size up-front.
>
> Nor do we need
On 3/10/23 05:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> There can certainly be a lot more elements in the "revisions" (and
> "names") arrays than there are gpios used to form the trinary number
> we're searching for; we simply don't know the array size up-front.
>
> Nor do we need to, because the loop body
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 02:58, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> There can certainly be a lot more elements in the "revisions" (and
> "names") arrays than there are gpios used to form the trinary number
> we're searching for; we simply don't know the array size up-front.
>
> Nor do we need to, because
There can certainly be a lot more elements in the "revisions" (and
"names") arrays than there are gpios used to form the trinary number
we're searching for; we simply don't know the array size up-front.
Nor do we need to, because the loop body already knows to recognize
-EOVERFLOW as "not that
4 matches
Mail list logo
