Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 13:24, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:22:13PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 13:07, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Alper, > > > > > > > > On T

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:22:13PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 13:07, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Alper, > > > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 04:20, Alper Nebi Yasak > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > O

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 13:07, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Alper, > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 04:20, Alper Nebi Yasak > > wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-08-28 20:54 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Alper, > > > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Alper, > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 04:20, Alper Nebi Yasak > wrote: > > > > On 2023-08-28 20:54 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Alper, > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 13:17, Alper Nebi Yasak > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On 2

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Alper, On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 04:20, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote: > > On 2023-08-28 20:54 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Alper, > > > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 13:17, Alper Nebi Yasak > > wrote: > >> > >> On 2023-08-24 06:02 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> In this early stage of using binman t

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-31 Thread Alper Nebi Yasak
On 2023-08-28 20:54 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Alper, > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 13:17, Alper Nebi Yasak > wrote: >> >> On 2023-08-24 06:02 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: >>> In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly >>> seeing people using common extensions suc

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:54:55AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Alper, > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 13:17, Alper Nebi Yasak > wrote: > > > > On 2023-08-24 06:02 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > > > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > > > seeing people using c

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-28 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Alper, On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 13:17, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote: > > On 2023-08-24 06:02 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > > seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' > > > > But unusual extensions appe

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-27 Thread Alper Nebi Yasak
On 2023-08-24 06:02 +03:00, Simon Glass wrote: > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' > > But unusual extensions appear in some places. > > We would like 'buildman -k' to keep the build outputs

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 08:49:36AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 08:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 08:41:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 20

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Michael Walle
Hi, > This series adjusts binman to enforce just 4 extensions for output > images: > >.bin >.rom >.itb >.img > > Other extensions will produce an error. With this rule observed, > buildman > can keep the required files. How does this work? I didn't get all the patches from this

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 08:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 08:41:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:02:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > In this early stage of u

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 08:41:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:02:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > > > seeing people us

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Michael, On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 01:32, Michael Walle wrote: > > Hi, > > > This series adjusts binman to enforce just 4 extensions for output > > images: > > > >.bin > >.rom > >.itb > >.img > > > > Other extensions will produce an error. With this rule observed, > > buildman > >

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Neha, On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 06:26, Neha Malcom Francis wrote: > > Hi Simon > > + Vignesh, Nishanth to comment on this as well > > On 24/08/23 08:32, Simon Glass wrote: > > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > > seeing people using common extensions such

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:02:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > > seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' > > > > But unusual extension

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:02:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly > seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' > > But unusual extensions appear in some places. > > We would like 'buildman -k' to keep th

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Neha Malcom Francis
Hi Simon + Vignesh, Nishanth to comment on this as well On 24/08/23 08:32, Simon Glass wrote: In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' [...] The fact that the .pem files are at the top level me

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-24 Thread Michael Walle
Hi, This series adjusts binman to enforce just 4 extensions for output images: .bin .rom .itb .img Other extensions will produce an error. With this rule observed, buildman can keep the required files. How does this work? I didn't get all the patches from this series, which m

[PATCH 0/6] Attempt to enforce standard extensions for build output

2023-08-23 Thread Simon Glass
In this early stage of using binman to produce output files, we are mostly seeing people using common extensions such as '.bin' and '.rom' But unusual extensions appear in some places. We would like 'buildman -k' to keep the build outputs, but this is hard if there is no consistency as to the ext