Hi Vasily,
On 2023/3/8 05:34, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:04 PM Mark Kettenis wrote:
And implement support for the CLK_PCIEPHYn_REF clocks in
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rk3568.c:rk3568_pmuclk_set_rate()?
Yes, I'd say so.
If U-Boot doesn't actually need these clocks to
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:04 PM Mark Kettenis wrote:
> And implement support for the CLK_PCIEPHYn_REF clocks in
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rk3568.c:rk3568_pmuclk_set_rate()?
>
> Yes, I'd say so.
>
> If U-Boot doesn't actually need these clocks to run at the frequency
> provided by
> From: Vasily Khoruzhick
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:34:48 -0800
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:53 AM Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > That is probably the wrong approach. It should be possible to boot an
> > OS with the device tree provided by U-Boot. Removing these properties
> > means the OS
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:53 AM Mark Kettenis wrote:
> That is probably the wrong approach. It should be possible to boot an
> OS with the device tree provided by U-Boot. Removing these properties
> means the OS doesn't see them either. But if the assigned-clocks
> property isn't needed it
> From: Vasily Khoruzhick
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:37:48 -0800
>
> combphy0 is failing to probe due to unhandled assigned-clocks and
> assigned-clocks-rates.
That is probably the wrong approach. It should be possible to boot an
OS with the device tree provided by U-Boot. Removing these
combphy0 is failing to probe due to unhandled assigned-clocks and
assigned-clocks-rates.
commit 5bec4b0de785 ("arm64: dts: rk356x-u-boot: Drop combphy1
assigned-clocks/rates")
dropped these properties for combphy1, so let's drop them for combphy0 as well.
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
