Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-11 Thread Marek Vasut
> On 11/10/2011 07:44 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Actually, maybe we should fix this in Linux first. Is the GPMI-NAND > > driver for i.MX28 applied already to mainline linux-mtd? > > Yes, it is in 3.2-rc1: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=tree;f=drive > rs/mtd/nand/g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-11 Thread Veli-Pekka Peltola
On 11/10/2011 07:44 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Actually, maybe we should fix this in Linux first. Is the GPMI-NAND driver for > i.MX28 applied already to mainline linux-mtd? Yes, it is in 3.2-rc1: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=tree;f=drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand I ha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:02:36PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some > > > drivers, is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to > > > malfunction on these drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. > > > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-10 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:02:36PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some > > drivers, is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to malfunction > > on these drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. > > > > This was dis

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some > drivers, is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to malfunction > on these drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. > > This was discussed already with no conclusion, see thread: > Message-Id: <130237233

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-06 Thread Marek Vasut
> On 11/06/2011 01:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Yes sure, but the controller driver sets it as a chip option as there's > > no "controller" option field and I don't want to introduce new > > definition consuming one bit in the top half of chip option. > > Let's see how evolve the discussion - all

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-06 Thread Stefano Babic
On 11/06/2011 01:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Yes sure, but the controller driver sets it as a chip option as there's no > "controller" option field and I don't want to introduce new definition > consuming > one bit in the top half of chip option. Let's see how evolve the discussion - allowin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-06 Thread Marek Vasut
> On 11/05/2011 03:24 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some > > drivers, is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to > > malfunction on these drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. > > Hi Marek, > > > This was discus

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-06 Thread Stefano Babic
On 11/05/2011 03:24 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some > drivers, > is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to malfunction on these > drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. > Hi Marek, > This was discussed alread

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Let NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE through

2011-11-04 Thread Marek Vasut
There is a problem reported that the NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE, set by some drivers, is silently ignored by NAND core. This causes UBI to malfunction on these drivers, because UBI tries to use subpage writes. This was discussed already with no conclusion, see thread: Message-Id: <1302372335-30232-6-gi