At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger st
Hello Simon,
added Bo Shen to cc, as he currently try to set BSS (and stack) into
SDRAM for at91 based boards ... Bo, could you try this aproach?
Am 18.01.2015 19:55, schrieb Simon Glass:
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL feat
Hello Simon,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700, Simon Glass
wrote:
> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
> environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
> point into SDRAM. T
On 18.01.2015 19:55, Simon Glass wrote:
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, be
Hi Simon,
On 18/01/2015 19:55, Simon Glass wrote:
> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
> environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
> point into SDRAM. They then set up SDR
Hi,
On 18 January 2015 at 23:46, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> added Bo Shen to cc, as he currently try to set BSS (and stack) into
> SDRAM for at91 based boards ... Bo, could you try this aproach?
>
> Am 18.01.2015 19:55, schrieb Simon Glass:
>
>> At present SPL uses a single stack, e
Hi Albert,
On 18 January 2015 at 23:54, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700, Simon Glass
> wrote:
>> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
>> environment) require
Hello Simon,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:39:34 -0700, Simon Glass
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On 18 January 2015 at 23:54, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hello Simon,
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700, Simon Glass
> > wrote:
> >> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
> >> C
Hi Simon Glass,
On 01/19/2015 02:55 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up
Hi Simon,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700
Simon Glass wrote:
> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
> environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
> point into SDRAM. Th
Hello Simon,
Am 19.01.2015 07:46, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Simon,
added Bo Shen to cc, as he currently try to set BSS (and stack) into
SDRAM for at91 based boards ... Bo, could you try this aproach?
Am 18.01.2015 19:55, schrieb Simon Glass:
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONF
Hi Masahiro,
On 21 January 2015 at 03:51, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
>> environment) re
Hi Simon,
> Yes agreed. I can do that. It seems like the concept is agreed at least.
>
> So how about this:
>
> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R - bool
> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R _SIZE - hex
Do you need the size of stack? Or the base address?
> But for your particular case, I certainly would like the UART to
Hi Masahiro,
On 21 January 2015 at 10:12, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
>
>> Yes agreed. I can do that. It seems like the concept is agreed at least.
>>
>> So how about this:
>>
>> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R - bool
>> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R _SIZE - hex
>
>
> Do you need the size of stack? Or the ba
Hello Simon, Masahiro,
Am 21.01.2015 16:51, schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Masahiro,
On 21 January 2015 at 03:51, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0700
Simon Glass wrote:
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since
Simon, Heiko,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:28:37 +0100
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> > But for your particular case, I certainly would like the UART to be
> > available early in SPL. We are in the very early days of driver model
> > for SPL. Once we get it merged (thanks to Tom's work this should be
> > so
Hi Masahiro,
On 22 January 2015 at 00:33, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Simon, Heiko,
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:28:37 +0100
> Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> > But for your particular case, I certainly would like the UART to be
>> > available early in SPL. We are in the very early days of driver model
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:10:07 -0700
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 22 January 2015 at 00:33, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> > Simon, Heiko,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:28:37 +0100
> > Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >
> >> > But for your particular case, I certainly would like
18 matches
Mail list logo
