Hi,
On 10/24/2016 11:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 24 October 2016 at 10:24, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
>>
>> (Also, this is kind of unrelated, but it looks like the error
>> message 'MMC: block number 0xx exceeds max(0xx)' has a formatting
>> issue!)
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c | 2 ++
On 10/26/2016 04:03 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/25/2016 06:13 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On 24 October 2016 at 10:24, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_MMC_OPS are enabled by default with
>>> CONFIG_DM_MMC, the DWMMC driver on the socfpga platform fails at
>>
Hi,
On 10/25/2016 06:13 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 24 October 2016 at 10:24, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
>>
>> Now that CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_MMC_OPS are enabled by default with
>> CONFIG_DM_MMC, the DWMMC driver on the socfpga platform fails at
>> runtime.
>>
>> This adds the missing fields in the dri
On 24 October 2016 at 10:24, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
>
> Now that CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_MMC_OPS are enabled by default with
> CONFIG_DM_MMC, the DWMMC driver on the socfpga platform fails at
> runtime.
>
> This adds the missing fields in the driver declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lesne
> ---
On 10/24/2016 06:24 PM, Sylvain Lesne wrote:
> Now that CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_MMC_OPS are enabled by default with
> CONFIG_DM_MMC, the DWMMC driver on the socfpga platform fails at
> runtime.
>
> This adds the missing fields in the driver declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lesne
> ---
Nice
Now that CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_MMC_OPS are enabled by default with
CONFIG_DM_MMC, the DWMMC driver on the socfpga platform fails at
runtime.
This adds the missing fields in the driver declaration.
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lesne
---
Hi,
I might be missing something, but with the latest master, on
6 matches
Mail list logo