Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-26 Thread Simon Glass
On 21 October 2015 at 14:42, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > On 21 October 2015 at 10:31, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-21 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 21 October 2015 at 10:31, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> PCI addresses are always

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:44:06PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus > and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based > on either the physical address size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-03 Thread Simon Glass
On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus > and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based > on either the physical

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() for CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2015-10-02 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based on either the physical address size of the CPU, nor any #address-cells property in DT (or more precisely,