Hi,
On 07/12/15 21:06, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:01:54PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
Seems 6ae6e160 broke creating multi and script type images and even
building of mkimage itself. There are two problems with that patch.
First is that expression (!(x == 0) || !(x == 1)) is alwa
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:01:54PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Seems 6ae6e160 broke creating multi and script type images and even
> building of mkimage itself. There are two problems with that patch.
>
> First is that expression (!(x == 0) || !(x == 1)) is always true for
> unsigned int x. The e
Hi,
I haven't had time to check the previous report yet.
On 07/12/15 19:01, Marek Vasut wrote:
Seems 6ae6e160 broke creating multi and script type images and even
building of mkimage itself. There are two problems with that patch.
First is that expression (!(x == 0) || !(x == 1)) is always tru
Hi Simon,
On 07/12/15 06:31, Simon Glass wrote:
- dfd = open(params.datafile, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);
- if (dfd < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: Can't open %s: %s\n",
- params.cmdname, params.datafile, strerror(errno));
- exit(EXIT_FAILUR
On Monday, December 07, 2015 at 06:47:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek,
>
> In message <1449507714-9599-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > Second is the coding which causes gcc 4.9.x and newer scream gruesome
> > death and murder. The expression !x == 0 && !x == 1 is ambiguous
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:47:36PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek,
>
> In message <1449507714-9599-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> >
> > Second is the coding which causes gcc 4.9.x and newer scream gruesome
> > death and murder. The expression !x == 0 && !x == 1 is ambiguou
Dear Marek,
In message <1449507714-9599-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Second is the coding which causes gcc 4.9.x and newer scream gruesome
> death and murder. The expression !x == 0 && !x == 1 is ambiguous and
> should instead be rewritten into (x != 0) && (x != 1) to be correct
On Monday, December 07, 2015 at 06:18:02 PM, Philippe De Swert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't had time to check the previous report yet.
>
> On 07/12/15 19:01, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Seems 6ae6e160 broke creating multi and script type images and even
> > building of mkimage itself. There are two prob
Seems 6ae6e160 broke creating multi and script type images and even
building of mkimage itself. There are two problems with that patch.
First is that expression (!(x == 0) || !(x == 1)) is always true for
unsigned int x. The expression must use AND (&&) not OR (||) to be
correct.
Second is the co
Hi Philippe,
On 7 December 2015 at 01:02, Philippe De Swert
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 07/12/15 06:31, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>
> - dfd = open(params.datafile, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);
> - if (dfd < 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: Can't open %s: %s\n",
> -
Hi Philippe,
On 3 December 2015 at 14:11, Philippe De Swert
wrote:
> Seems 92a655c3 broke creating multi and script type images.
> Since the file1:file2:file3 string does not get split up,
> it fails on trying to open an non-existing file.
>
> mkimage -A arm -O linux -T multi -C none -d zImage:sp
Seems 92a655c3 broke creating multi and script type images.
Since the file1:file2:file3 string does not get split up,
it fails on trying to open an non-existing file.
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T multi -C none -d zImage:splash.bmp:device.dtb uimage
tools/mkimage: Can't open zImage:splash.bmp:device
12 matches
Mail list logo