On 8/13/10 5:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> http://elinux.org/CELF_Project_Proposal/Rework_ARM_architecture_support_in_U-Boot
>
> Yes, this is the one.
[snip[
> If you read the thread you can see that both Heikos tests and other
> testers who tried that code see dramatic speed improvements due to
>
Dear Magnus Lilja,
In message <4c645e51.6020...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> > The plan is as follows:
> >
> > I will pull this stuff into the "next" branch about one week after I
> > released "rc1". I intend to keep this "CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC"
> > feature for a full r
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> The plan is as follows:
>
> I will pull this stuff into the "next" branch about one week after I
> released "rc1". I intend to keep this "CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC"
> feature for a full release cycle. Early in the next branch for the
> following release it will be removed
Dear Shinya Kuribayashi,
In message <4c63ef34.7000...@pobox.com> you wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 09:50 PM, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> > It would be gratefull if someone could expalain a bit about this big
> > change. What's the primary motivation for full relocation?
>
> Forgot to mention; the reaso
Dear Shinya Kuribayashi,
In message <4c63ee15.4060...@pobox.com> you wrote:
>
> > Please also read doc/README.arm-relocation There is more
> > info what is done, and maybe should be done.
>
> It would be gratefull if someone could expalain a bit about this big
> change. What's the primary motiv
On 08/12/2010 09:50 PM, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> It would be gratefull if someone could expalain a bit about this big
> change. What's the primary motivation for full relocation?
Forgot to mention; the reason why I'd like to know is, because I'm
an ARM newbie, and interested in such topics.
__
On 08/12/2010 03:15 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
> based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
> based boards.
>
> Relocation support:
>
> !! This change is not compatible to old code !!
>
> If you want to compi
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> a few comments...
>
> In message <4c62e8c3.8050...@denx.de> you wrote:
>> This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
>> based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
>> based boards.
>>
>> Re
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Ben Gardiner
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
>> based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
>> based boards.
>
> I pulled u-boot-testing/arm-re
Dear Heiko Schocher,
a few comments...
In message <4c62e8c3.8050...@denx.de> you wrote:
> This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
> based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
> based boards.
>
> Relocation support:
>
> !! This change is not compati
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
> based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
> based boards.
I pulled u-boot-testing/arm-reloc-and-cache-support and had to clobber
the old branch cause
This patch series add full relocation and cache support for arm
based boards. I test this for arm1136, arm_cortexa8 and arm926ejs
based boards.
Relocation support:
!! This change is not compatible to old code !!
If you want to compile in old style, you can set
CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC
but
12 matches
Mail list logo
