Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-13 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Philip Balister > wrote: > > On 09/11/2011 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > >> I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will > >> this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of > >> OMAP3. > >> > >> I've got

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-13 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> On 09/11/2011 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > > I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will > > this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of > > OMAP3. > > > > I've got a number of other patches that should go upstream that are > > Overo ce

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-13 Thread Jason Kridner
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 09/11/2011 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >> I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will >> this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of >> OMAP3. >> >> I've got a number of other pa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-13 Thread Philip Balister
On 09/11/2011 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will > this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of > OMAP3. > > I've got a number of other patches that should go upstream that are > Overo centric. In gener

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-11 Thread Philip Balister
I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of OMAP3. I've got a number of other patches that should go upstream that are Overo centric. In general, what route should they take upstream? Philip On 0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-09 Thread Enric Balletbò i Serra
2011/9/9 Philip Balister : > The existing timing does not quite meet the minimum requirements > in the LAN9221 datasheet. The timing in this patch solves problems > noticed on some parts. The patch also combines the CS configuration > for the overo and igep0020 boards per request. > > Signed-off-by

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OMAP3: Overo: Update GPMC timing for ethernet chip.

2011-09-08 Thread Philip Balister
The existing timing does not quite meet the minimum requirements in the LAN9221 datasheet. The timing in this patch solves problems noticed on some parts. The patch also combines the CS configuration for the overo and igep0020 boards per request. Signed-off-by: Philip Balister --- Changes for v2: