Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

2019-10-22 Thread Matthias Brugger
On 22/10/2019 01:47, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias@kernel.org wrote: >>> From: Matthias Brugger >>> >>> The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the >>> upstream

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

2019-10-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Matthias, On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Matthias Brugger > > > > The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the > > upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

2019-09-25 Thread Matthias Brugger
Hi Simon, On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias@kernel.org wrote: > From: Matthias Brugger > > The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the > upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells > was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding > patches from

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix default values for address and size cells

2019-09-05 Thread matthias . bgg
From: Matthias Brugger The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding patches from the upstream project. Changes since v1: - fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1