Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Stefano Babic
Hio Otavio, On 12/08/2013 17:23, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: ... The patchset allows to add to the imx Header the CSF (command Sequence File) generated by the tools provided by Freescale. The CSF is then simply concatenated

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: Hio Otavio, On 12/08/2013 17:23, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: ... The patchset allows to add to the imx Header the CSF (command Sequence File) generated by

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by Simon Glass, that can be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Tom, On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Tom, On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Tom, On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Tom Rini, On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Tom, On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-12 Thread Stefano Babic
(header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot later a secure image. Freescale's secure

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

2013-08-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: ... The patchset allows to add to the imx Header the CSF (command Sequence File) generated by the tools provided by Freescale. The CSF is then simply concatenated to the u-boot image, making a signed bootloader, that the