Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/18] dm: Introduce device tree support in SPL (for Rockchip)

2015-06-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Tom, On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference between

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/18] dm: Introduce device tree support in SPL (for Rockchip)

2015-06-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Tom, On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/18] dm: Introduce device tree support in SPL (for Rockchip)

2015-06-04 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree. This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example. I'd like to

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/18] dm: Introduce device tree support in SPL (for Rockchip)

2015-05-12 Thread Simon Glass
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree. This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example. One problem with device tree is that U-Boot has no way of dropping features it does