On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
between
Hi Tom,
On 4 June 2015 at 17:48, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
This
Hi Tom,
On 12 May 2015 at 14:55, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example.
I'd like to
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference
between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree.
This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example.
One problem with device tree is that U-Boot has no way of dropping features
it does
4 matches
Mail list logo