Hi Simon:
On 2019/3/11 上午10:30, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 03:52, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi Simon:
On 2019/2/12 下午11:31, Simon Glass wrote:
HI Andy,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi Philipp:
Sorry for the late reply, we just come back from the
> On 11.03.2019, at 03:30, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 03:52, Andy Yan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon:
>>
>> On 2019/2/12 下午11:31, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> HI Andy,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi Philipp:
Sorry for the late
Hi Andy,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 03:52, Andy Yan wrote:
>
> Hi Simon:
>
> On 2019/2/12 下午11:31, Simon Glass wrote:
> > HI Andy,
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Andy Yan wrote:
> >> Hi Philipp:
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late reply, we just come back from the Chinese Spring
> >> Festival.
Hi Simon:
On 2019/2/12 下午11:31, Simon Glass wrote:
HI Andy,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi Philipp:
Sorry for the late reply, we just come back from the Chinese Spring
Festival.
On 2019/2/1 下午6:26, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Kever,
Independent of whether we revert
HI Andy,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Andy Yan wrote:
>
> Hi Philipp:
>
> Sorry for the late reply, we just come back from the Chinese Spring
> Festival.
>
> On 2019/2/1 下午6:26, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> > Kever,
> >
> > Independent of whether we revert this for the current cycle (and also
Hi Philipp:
Sorry for the late reply, we just come back from the Chinese Spring
Festival.
On 2019/2/1 下午6:26, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Kever,
Independent of whether we revert this for the current cycle (and also
independent of
if I ever find the other patch you had been referring to — I
Hi Kever,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 03:26, Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> Kever,
>
> Independent of whether we revert this for the current cycle (and also
> independent of
> if I ever find the other patch you had been referring to — I couldn’t find it
> in my local
> mailing list archive) and then
Kever,
Independent of whether we revert this for the current cycle (and also
independent of
if I ever find the other patch you had been referring to — I couldn’t find it
in my local
mailing list archive) and then deprecate it for the next release (unless
converted to
DM), we still have a
> On 01.02.2019, at 10:32, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> Hi Philipp,
>
> This is not right, this patch should not merged like this!!!
>
> I have give my review comment in previous mail, and this will break
> many boards.
>
> My another patch do not break anything, but you insist NAK it
Hi Philipp,
This is not right, this patch should not merged like this!!!
I have give my review comment in previous mail, and this will break
many boards.
My another patch do not break anything, but you insist NAK it
without acceptable reason;
This patch definitely break other
10 matches
Mail list logo