Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-03 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2012/05/03 15:11:33: > > Dear Joakim, > > In message > you > wrote: > > > > I found the problem, u-boot is somewhat flawed, it requires > > CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE > > to be "base 2 even", must land on a 256K or 512K or 1024K address. I had > > This is not a generic U-Bo

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim, In message you wrote: > > I found the problem, u-boot is somewhat flawed, it requires > CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE > to be "base 2 even", must land on a 256K or 512K or 1024K address. I had This is not a generic U-Boot problem, just one oif the 85xx implementation. > On a related m

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-03 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > "Schneider, Kolja" wrote on 2012/05/03 10:46:55: > > > > > > If you mean the BDI is trying to initialize things rather than leave the > > > > system in its default state, don't do that. > > > > > > Yes, trying to get there. > > > > > > > Easily done, just throw out everything in the [init] sec

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-03 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
"Schneider, Kolja" wrote on 2012/05/03 10:46:55: > > > > If you mean the BDI is trying to initialize things rather than leave the > > > system in its default state, don't do that. > > > > Yes, trying to get there. > > > > Easily done, just throw out everything in the [init] section. Or is this >

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-03 Thread Schneider, Kolja
> > If you mean the BDI is trying to initialize things rather than leave the > > system in its default state, don't do that. > > Yes, trying to get there. > Easily done, just throw out everything in the [init] section. Or is this really just about BDI presence, as Scott suggested? > > > > > We

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-02 Thread Scott Wood
On 05/02/2012 03:09 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Scott Wood wrote on 2012/05/02 21:34:18: >> >> On 05/02/2012 02:04 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> We can run the full u-boot it we use the BDI emulator but without emulator >>> it >>> won't boot. >> >> I'm not sure what "BDI emulator but without

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-02 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Scott Wood wrote on 2012/05/02 21:34:18: > > On 05/02/2012 02:04 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > Still trying to wrap my head around the P2010 cpu and its boot sequence(NOR) > > Yeah, it's a bit convoluted. Yes, fully agreed. I miss the sane 0 address boot vector too. > > > We can run the fu

Re: [U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-02 Thread Scott Wood
On 05/02/2012 02:04 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Still trying to wrap my head around the P2010 cpu and its boot sequence(NOR) Yeah, it's a bit convoluted. > We can run the full u-boot it we use the BDI emulator but without emulator it > won't boot. I'm not sure what "BDI emulator but without

[U-Boot] Default LAWBAR mapping at reset for mpc85xx?

2012-05-02 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Still trying to wrap my head around the P2010 cpu and its boot sequence(NOR) We can run the full u-boot it we use the BDI emulator but without emulator it won't boot. We have 64 MB NOR flash and have based out design on the P1020RDB and we boot from NOR. Using the emulator but with minimal config