On 04/12/2016 06:09 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 12.04.2016 18:00, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 6
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 18:11 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/12/2016 06:08 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/12/2016 11:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
> > > > > On 7 April 2016
On 04/12/2016 06:08 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2016 11:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 12.04.2016 18:00, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, Georg
On 04/12/2016 11:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
On 04/12/2016 05:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
>
>>>
On 04/07/2016 06:31 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hi,
>>> U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 1
On 04/11/2016 04:03 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 10 April 2016 at 10:47, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/09/2016 12:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 8 April 2016 at 05:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/08/2016 07:16 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
>
>
>>>
On 10 April 2016 at 10:47, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 12:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 8 April 2016 at 05:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/08/2016 07:16 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
Try with the attached patch (and probabl
On 04/09/2016 12:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 8 April 2016 at 05:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 07:16 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Try with the attached patch (and probably with dcache off)
>>
>> The patch applied clean
On 8 April 2016 at 05:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 07:16 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Try with the attached patch (and probably with dcache off)
>
> The patch applied cleanly. The behavior is unchanged with both
> dcache
On 04/08/2016 07:16 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
>
>
>
> Try with the attached patch (and probably with dcache off)
The patch applied cleanly. The behavior is unchanged with both
dcache on and off. The "good" sticks still work, and "bad" st
On 08.04.2016 01:51, George Broz wrote:
Try with the attached patch (and probably with dcache off)
>>>
>>> The patch applied cleanly. The behavior is unchanged with both
>>> dcache on and off. The "good" sticks still work, and "bad" sticks still
>>> don't.
>>
>> OK. Then I should probably
On 7 April 2016 at 16:36, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 01:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
>
>
On 04/08/2016 01:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hi,
>>> U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 17:
On 7 April 2016 at 13:39, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>> U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 17:57:23)
>> drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: Prepar
On 04/07/2016 03:14 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
> U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 17:57:23)
> drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: Preparing to start memory calibration
> drivers/ddr/alter
On 6 April 2016 at 19:05, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 17:57:23)
drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: Preparing to start memory calibration
drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: CALIBRATION PASSED
drivers/ddr/a
On 04/07/2016 03:42 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hi,
>>> U-Boot SPL 2016.03 (Apr 05 2016 - 17:57:23)
>>> drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: Preparing to start memory calibration
>>> drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: CALIBRATION PASSED
>>> drivers/ddr/altera/sequencer.c: Calibration complete
>>> Trying to bo
On 6 April 2016 at 03:43, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 03:17 AM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 5 April 2016 at 17:45, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2016 02:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
On 5 April 2016 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>> On 27/0
On 04/06/2016 05:04 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 6/04/2016 7:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 09:00 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 6/04/2016 6:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, D
On 6/04/2016 7:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/06/2016 09:00 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 6/04/2016 6:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote
On 04/06/2016 09:00 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 6/04/2016 6:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 04/06/2016 03:17 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 5 April 2016 at 17:45, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 02:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 5 April 2016 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/22/20
On 6/04/2016 6:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk through my workflow.
I am
not usi
On 5 April 2016 at 17:45, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 02:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 5 April 2016 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
On 04/06/2016 02:31 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 5 April 2016 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>
On 5 April 2016 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk
On 04/05/2016 10:33 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk through my workflow.
> I am
> not using any Al
On 27/03/2016 4:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk through my workflow. I am
not using any Altera tools when I build.
$make socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig
$make u-boot
On 03/29/2016 03:44 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 20 March 2016 at 08:55, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/16/2016 08:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Does this work for anybody else?
Is it in anyone's experience that these (cheaper) Terasic
eval boards are generally out of spec?
On 03/29/2016 03:56 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 20 March 2016 at 09:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/18/2016 10:22 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On
On 20 March 2016 at 09:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 10:22 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On
On 20 March 2016 at 08:55, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2016 08:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>> Does this work for anybody else?
>>> Is it in anyone's experience that these (cheaper) Terasic
>>> eval boards are generally out of spec?
>>>
>>> Is there a way to relax the calibration parameter
On 03/22/2016 06:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk through my workflow. I am
>>> not using any Altera tools when I build.
>>>
>>> $make socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig
>>> $make u-boot-with-spl.sfp
>>>
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 23:45 +0800, Chin Liang See wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 22:05 +0800, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 20:03 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 03/04/2016 05:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
[..]
> > > > > Well, th
On 03/20/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I know that doesn't help. So let's walk through my workflow. I am
>> not using any Altera tools when I build.
>>
>> $make socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig
>> $make u-boot-with-spl.sfp
>> $dd if=u-boot-with-spl.sfp of=/dev/sdb3
>>
>> My gcc is:
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 22:05 +0800, Chin Liang See wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 20:03 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 03/04/2016 05:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On 03/03/2016 12:08 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > > On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 20:03 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 05:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 03/03/2016 12:08 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > > CC: Marek Vasut
> > > > >
> > > > > On 03/
On 03/19/2016 12:10 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 19/03/2016 5:22 AM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 15 Mar
On 03/20/2016 04:55 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2016 08:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>> Does this work for anybody else?
>>> Is it in anyone's experience that these (cheaper) Terasic
>>> eval boards are generally out of spec?
>>>
>>> Is there a way to relax the calibration parameters?
On 03/18/2016 10:22 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>
>>>
On 03/16/2016 08:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> Does this work for anybody else?
>> Is it in anyone's experience that these (cheaper) Terasic
>> eval boards are generally out of spec?
>>
>> Is there a way to relax the calibration parameters? the USB parameters?
>>
>> Would it help if I posted de
On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello again -
>>>
>>> So under the assumption my SoCKit h/w was broken, I bought a new board.
>>> They are back ordered on SoCKit boards, so I got
On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>
> Hello again -
>
> So under the as
On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>>>
Hello again -
So under the assumption my SoCKit h/w was broken, I bought a new board.
On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>
> Hello again -
>
> So under the assumption my SoCKit h/w was broken, I bought a new board.
> They are back ordered on SoCKit boards, so I got a DE0-Nano-SoC instead.
>
> I build the v2016.03 (release) version of u-boot-with-spl.sfp.
>
> I power-up
On 19/03/2016 5:22 AM, George Broz wrote:
On 18 March 2016 at 12:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/18/2016 07:59 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 16 March 2016 at 18:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
Hello again -
So und
On 03/16/2016 05:17 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 18:29, George Broz wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello again -
>>
>> So under the assumption my SoCKit h/w was broken, I bought a new board.
>> They are back ordered on SoCKit boards, so I got a DE0-Nano-SoC instead.
>>
>> I build the v2016.03 (re
On 9 March 2016 at 08:06, George Broz wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 02:55, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/09/2016 02:42 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> G'day George,
>>>
>>> On 3/03/2016 10:57 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrot
On 9 March 2016 at 02:55, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 02:42 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
>> G'day George,
>>
>> On 3/03/2016 10:57 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
>
> On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wr
On 03/09/2016 02:42 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
> G'day George,
>
> On 3/03/2016 10:57 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
>
> On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wr
G'day George,
On 3/03/2016 10:57 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back
On 03/04/2016 05:06 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 12:08 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
CC: Marek Vasut
On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Rei
On 03/03/2016 04:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 11:00 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 3 March 2016 at 06:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2016 03:48 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Well, that's our usual USB/QSPI cache issue t
On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 12:08 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> CC: Marek Vasut
>>>
>>> On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
> G'day George
>
>
> On 1
On 3 March 2016 at 15:07, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 3 March 2016 at 14:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2016 11:27 PM, George Broz wrote:
Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
Yes - would love to be using the SPL from 2016.01 for the Terasic board,
but it does not seem to be working for me
On 03/03/2016 11:00 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 06:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 03:48 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Well, that's our usual USB/QSPI cache issue that's tormenting your soul.
CCing Chin ;-)
On 3 March 2016 at 06:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 03:48 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, that's our usual USB/QSPI cache issue that's tormenting your soul.
>>> CCing Chin ;-)
>>>
>>> Does the issue by any chance magically disappear
On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>
>> On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>>
Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back to this
now. I patched
socfpga_
On 2 March 2016 at 23:11, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>
>> On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>>
Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back to this
now. I patched
socfpga_
On 03/03/2016 03:48 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> Well, that's our usual USB/QSPI cache issue that's tormenting your soul.
>> CCing Chin ;-)
>>
>> Does the issue by any chance magically disappear if you apply this patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/
On 03/02/2016 05:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Well, that's our usual USB/QSPI cache issue that's tormenting your soul.
> CCing Chin ;-)
>
> Does the issue by any chance magically disappear if you apply this patch:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
On 03/03/2016 07:55 AM, George Broz wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 14:54, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>>> socfpga_common.h and re-built the project. I picked up
>>> spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp and
>>> u-boot-dtb.img and transferred them to the SD card with:
>>>
>>> dd if=u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp of=/dev/sdf3 bs=64k s
On 3/03/2016 2:49 PM, George Broz wrote:
On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back to this
now. I patched
socfpga_common.h and re-built the project. I picked up
spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp and
On 2 March 2016 at 14:54, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> socfpga_common.h and re-built the project. I picked up
>> spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp and
>> u-boot-dtb.img and transferred them to the SD card with:
>>
>> dd if=u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp of=/dev/sdf3 bs=64k seek=0
>> dd if=u-boot-dtb.img of=/dev/sdf3 bs=64k se
On 1 March 2016 at 19:49, Phil Reid wrote:
> On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back to this
>> now. I patched
>> socfpga_common.h and re-built the project. I picked up
>> spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp and
>> u-boot-dtb.img and transfer
On 03/03/2016 12:08 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> CC: Marek Vasut
>>
>> On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
G'day George
On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
>
> Hell
On 03/02/2016 04:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> CC: Marek Vasut
>
> On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> G'day George
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the newbie question...
>>>
On 03/02/2016 11:54 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> CC: Marek Vasut
>
> On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
>> On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> G'day George
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the newbie question...
>>>
CC: Marek Vasut
On 03/01/2016 08:40 PM, George Broz wrote:
> On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
>> G'day George
>>
>>
>> On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the newbie question...
>>>
>>> I have an Altera/Terasic board (socfpga_sockit) that has i
On 2/03/2016 10:40 AM, George Broz wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response - got called away, but am back to this
now. I patched
socfpga_common.h and re-built the project. I picked up
spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp and
u-boot-dtb.img and transferred them to the SD card with:
dd if=u-boot-spl-dtb.sfp of=/
On 17 February 2016 at 18:45, Phil Reid wrote:
> G'day George
>
>
> On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the newbie question...
>>
>> I have an Altera/Terasic board (socfpga_sockit) that has issues
>> recognizing
>> USB storage devices (roughly 60% good / 40% bad)
G'day George
On 18/02/2016 5:54 AM, George Broz wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the newbie question...
I have an Altera/Terasic board (socfpga_sockit) that has issues recognizing
USB storage devices (roughly 60% good / 40% bad):
SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5 # usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB0: scanning bus 0 for d
Hello,
Sorry for the newbie question...
I have an Altera/Terasic board (socfpga_sockit) that has issues recognizing
USB storage devices (roughly 60% good / 40% bad):
SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5 # usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB0: scanning bus 0 for devices... DW_USB: Transfer completion
interrupt timeout
Ti
75 matches
Mail list logo