[U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-01 Thread Michael Cashwell
Greetings, I think or something related to it has confused OMAP4 clock init. I haven't entirely unraveled the onion but wanted to ping the list to see if this is known or I'm off in the weeds. Using u-boot master at commit a268170 in DEBUG mode the SP

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Sricharan R
Hi Mike Cashwell, On Monday 01 April 2013 09:12 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote: > Greetings, > > I think or something related to > it has confused OMAP4 clock init. I haven't entirely unraveled the onion but > wanted to ping the list to see if this is kno

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Michael Cashwell
On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> On first blush, it looks like having both cm_l3instr_intrconn_wp1_clkct and >> cm_l3instr_intrconn_wp1_clkctrl is a mistake. > > First, on which board are you testing ?. I tested the mainline on my 4460 > ES1.1 PANDA and it booted. One custom

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Sricharan R
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 05:59 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote: > On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > >>> On first blush, it looks like having both cm_l3instr_intrconn_wp1_clkct and >>> cm_l3instr_intrconn_wp1_clkctrl is a mistake. >> >> First, on which board are you testing ?. I tested

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2013 11:06 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > On Tuesday 02 April 2013 05:59 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Sricharan R >> wrote: [snip] >>> Also why are you enabling the non-essential clocks ? >> >> Because I must be able

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Sricharan R
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 08:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/02/2013 11:06 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 April 2013 05:59 PM, Michael Cashwell wrote: >>> On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Sricharan R >>> wrote: > [snip] Also why are you

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2013 11:55 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > On Tuesday 02 April 2013 08:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 04/02/2013 11:06 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >>> On Tuesday 02 April 2013 05:59 PM, Michael Cashwell w

Re: [U-Boot] Potential issue with recent OMAP PRCM struct unification

2013-04-02 Thread Sricharan R
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 10:12 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/02/2013 11:55 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 April 2013 08:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 04/02/2013 11:06 AM, Sricharan R wr