Dear Wolfgang,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In order to relate on this indication we must be sure it is operating
>> correctly.
>> It could be done by observing diagnostics LEDs performing running "1" pattern
>> or any different algorithm which user is expected. Only
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160556o71b9814dl3bb35f26ff5ad...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > You may of course do that - it's your local code after all. But I tend
> > to believe that this does not make much sense. Interactive tests
> > should be run at a time when interaction
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <660c0f821002160239w30d02211k66cd1df24c987...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> The test blinks the LEDs few times and performs running "1"
>> >> ilumination. Of course only visual control is possible
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002160239w30d02211k66cd1df24c987...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> >> The test blinks the LEDs few times and performs running "1"
> >> ilumination. Of course only visual control is possible. The general
> >
> > This is not acceptable as a POST then. Only
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <660c0f821002150322g34255468re9cf03d2ed493...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > Just out of interest, what exactly do you test there? Do you have
>> > any
>> > way of measuring if the LEDs work or no
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f821002150322g34255468re9cf03d2ed493...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest, what exactly do you test there? Do you have
> > any
> > way of measuring if the LEDs work or not?
>
> The test blinks the LEDs few times and performs running "1
Hi Michael,
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>>> In continuation to my post where I explained necessity
>>> of user defined post_progress_status facility
>>> (see. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067662.html)
>>> I am looking now for t
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> In continuation to my post where I explained necessity
>> of user defined post_progress_status facility
>> (see. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067662.html)
>> I am looking now for the best way of causin
Hi Michael,
> In continuation to my post where I explained necessity
> of user defined post_progress_status facility
> (see. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067662.html)
> I am looking now for the best way of causing the diagnostics output
> interface test to be run first. In m
Hi Detlev,
In continuation to my post where I explained necessity
of user defined post_progress_status facility
(see. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067662.html)
I am looking now for the best way of causing the diagnostics output
interface test to be run first. In my case it i
10 matches
Mail list logo
