Hi,
I noticed that fsl_esdhc is broken on 2017.09 for mx6slevk, when
CONFIG_DM_MMC is selected:
U-Boot 2017.09 (Sep 30 2017 - 12:31:17 -0300)
CPU: Freescale i.MX6SL rev1.0 792 MHz (running at 396 MHz)
CPU: Commercial temperature grade (0C to 95C) at 35C
Reset cause: WDOG
Model: Freescale i.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that fsl_esdhc is broken on 2017.09 for mx6slevk, when
> CONFIG_DM_MMC is selected:
>
> U-Boot 2017.09 (Sep 30 2017 - 12:31:17 -0300)
>
> CPU: Freescale i.MX6SL rev1.0 792 MHz (running at 396 MHz)
> CPU: Commercial tem
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:29:58AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that fsl_esdhc is broken on 2017.09 for mx6slevk, when
> > CONFIG_DM_MMC is selected:
> >
> > U-Boot 2017.09 (Sep 30 2017 - 12:31:17 -0300)
> >
> > CPU
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> Same regression is observed with mx7dsabresd board as well.
>
> It's likely to be all i.MX :(
Only the i.MX configs with CONFIG_DM_MMC=y.
> Have all of the changes gone in such that an i.MX platform with SPL can
> be non-interactively
Hi Fabio,
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
Same regression is observed with mx7dsabresd board as well.
It's likely to be all i.MX :(
Only the i.MX configs with CONFIG_DM_MMC=y.
Yes, I can confirm this.
I'm using SPL + imx_usb (and boot to eMMC) on my imx6q boar
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>>> Same regression is observed with mx7dsabresd board as well.
>>
>> It's likely to be all i.MX :(
>
> Only the i.MX configs with CONFIG_DM_MMC=y.
mx6slevk_spl_defconfig does n
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>>> Same regression is observed with mx7dsabresd board as well.
>>
>> It's likely to be all i.MX :(
>
> Only the i.MX configs with CONFIG_DM_MMC=y.
>
>> Have all of the changes go
Hi Jagan,
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Yes, currently I'm using DM_MMC for U-Boot proper and recently I've
> moved SPL as well [1]. But I've seen an issue with i.MX6UL while
> moving to OF_SPL
What exactly is the MX6UL issue you see?
Thanks
_
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
>> Yes, currently I'm using DM_MMC for U-Boot proper and recently I've
>> moved SPL as well [1]. But I've seen an issue with i.MX6UL while
>> moving to OF_SPL
>
> What exactly
Hi Jagan,
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> I didn't dig much, but the i.MX6UL case has rebooting with DM_MMC for
> both SPL and U-Boot proper.
Looks like the same issue I saw with mx6q, which has been fixed by this commit:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=3ea05
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
>> I didn't dig much, but the i.MX6UL case has rebooting with DM_MMC for
>> both SPL and U-Boot proper.
>
> Looks like the same issue I saw with mx6q, which has been fixed by
Hi Jagan,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Still looping for i.MX6UL.
Can you test it again removing CONFIG_DM_MMC support?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
>> Still looping for i.MX6UL.
>
> Can you test it again removing CONFIG_DM_MMC support?
I've observed here, u-boot is unable to relocate. So when I build
U-Boot w
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> I've observed here, u-boot is unable to relocate. So when I build
> U-Boot with removing u-boot,dm-spl from dts it works fine, but idea
> here I need to use SPL_OF_CONTROL and it is not related to DM_MMC I
> suppose.
Ok, a different bug then.
+ Stefano
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
>> I've observed here, u-boot is unable to relocate. So when I build
>> U-Boot with removing u-boot,dm-spl from dts it works fine, but idea
>> here I need to use SPL_OF_CONTROL
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:09:04PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
> > I've observed here, u-boot is unable to relocate. So when I build
> > U-Boot with removing u-boot,dm-spl from dts it works fine, but idea
> > here I need to use SPL_OF_CONTROL
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:41:38 -0400
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:09:04PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jagan Teki
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've observed here, u-boot is unable to relocate. So when I build
> > > U-Boot with removing u-boot,dm-spl fro
Hi Lukasz,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> There is some ongoing work to provide such facility. for imx6
> boards. I will keep you informed.
That's good news! Please keep me in the loop as well.
Thanks
___
U-Boot mailing
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
>> There is some ongoing work to provide such facility. for imx6
>> boards. I will keep you informed.
>
> That's good news! Please keep me in the loop as well.
Wou
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>
>>> There is some ongoing work to provide such facility. for imx6
>>> boards. I will keep you informed.
>>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Hi Lukasz,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>
There is some ongoing work to provide such
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> The Logic PD board is also broken as well. When I did a git bisect on
> mine, it shows:
Does this help?
--- a/configs/imx6q_logic_defconfig
+++ b/configs/imx6q_logic_defconfig
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ CONFIG_CMD_FAT=y
CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC=y
CONFIG
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>
>> The Logic PD board is also broken as well. When I did a git bisect on
>> mine, it shows:
>
> Does this help?
Yes it did. Thank you
I'll submit a patch. Should I indicate it 'fixes' t
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> Yes it did. Thank you
>
> I'll submit a patch. Should I indicate it 'fixes' that commit I
> referenced, or is there some other commit that I should reference?
I have just sent a patch that fixes the issue for all imx boards.
To all guys @ELCE,
Can we setup a formal meeting to discuss about ' U-Boot regression and test
suit setup'
Do you think?
On 16-Oct-2017 10:51 PM, "Jagan Teki" wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
25 matches
Mail list logo