On 01/10/15 03:38 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
Otavio, please note that the watchdog changes that are committed that we
are referring
to broke ls102x. So if you revert those as you suggest here you would have
ls102x working
again but it would
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
> Otavio, please note that the watchdog changes that are committed that we
> are referring
> to broke ls102x. So if you revert those as you suggest here you would have
> ls102x working
> again but it would break imx6 which the commit was for.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
> I agree, this is something needs to be done in steps and not in rush.
> For coming out of rc4 and making sure ls1021atwr reset works, all
> we need is to make sure that SRS bit is set and that this bit is written
> properly with big endian.
On 01/10/15 03:17 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:09:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
I took a further look at this. I believe this won't work as readw
will now retu
On 01/10/15 03:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:09:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
I took a further look at this. I believe this won't work as readw
will now return the data in the wrong endianness. I think Wolfgang
als
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:09:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
>> > I took a further look at this. I believe this won't work as readw
>> > will now return the data in the wrong endianness. I
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:09:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
> > I took a further look at this. I believe this won't work as readw
> > will now return the data in the wrong endianness. I think Wolfgang
> > also already pointed out at this.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sinan Akman wrote:
> I took a further look at this. I believe this won't work as readw
> will now return the data in the wrong endianness. I think Wolfgang
> also already pointed out at this. We would need to use the macro with
> correct endianness for different
Hi Fabio
On 30/09/15 03:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
[...]
Ok, the issue is due to endianness: on LS1021 the watchdog is
big-endian, so that's why we can't use clrsetbits_le16().
Please check:
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/layerscape/ls1021a/linux.git/commit/?id=b53a344d20f6ffdc383d99
9 matches
Mail list logo
