On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 04:49:12PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:10:21PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into
> > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based
> > board
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:10:21PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into
> our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based
> board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage.
It
Wadim,
> On 05.04.2019, at 12:10, Wadim Egorov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into
> our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based
> board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage.
I reco
Hi,
Am Freitag, 5. April 2019, 12:10:21 CEST schrieb Wadim Egorov:
> it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into
> our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based
> board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage.
>
> So
Hi,
it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into
our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based
board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage.
So my question is: is there any work going on to reduce the SPL size
even m
5 matches
Mail list logo