Re: [U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size

2019-04-16 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 04:49:12PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:10:21PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into > > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based > > board

Re: [U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size

2019-04-15 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:10:21PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote: > Hi, > > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based > board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage. It

Re: [U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size

2019-04-05 Thread Philipp Tomsich
Wadim, > On 05.04.2019, at 12:10, Wadim Egorov wrote: > > Hi, > > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based > board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage. I reco

Re: [U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size

2019-04-05 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi, Am Freitag, 5. April 2019, 12:10:21 CEST schrieb Wadim Egorov: > it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into > our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based > board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage. > > So

[U-Boot] rk3288 SPL size

2019-04-05 Thread Wadim Egorov
Hi, it seems the new common rockchip pinctrl driver does not really fit into our phycore-rk3288 SPL setup. It works for every other rk3288 based board because they don't need special power configurations at the SPL stage. So my question is: is there any work going on to reduce the SPL size even m