Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-14 Thread Peter Robinson
>> I am not aware of anyone using the U-Boot API for grub these days, so >> I'm not sure it's an incredibly useful goal. The main pain point distros >> seem to have is to make something that "just works" on all systems out >> there. Moving into that direction should be our ultimate goal. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:00:21AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 25.12.15 17:50, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-14 Thread Alexander Graf
On 25.12.15 17:50, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: >> Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok >> https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ and >> things Just Work. I setup a bunch of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 06:39:16PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:10:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > So, my only "big" concern here is, are we as a community able to view > > and implement the relevant parts of the UEFI spec (without having to > > agree to a potentially

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 04.01.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andreas Färber: > Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: >> Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok >> https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ and >> things Just Work. I setup a bunch of SD cards with Debian and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.01.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andreas Färber: > > Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: > >> Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Matwey V. Kornilov
2016-01-04 19:56 GMT+03:00 Tom Rini : > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:25:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > [snip] >> I am not aware of anyone using the U-Boot API for grub these days, so >> I'm not sure it's an incredibly useful goal. The main pain point distros >> seem to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 04.01.16 23:37, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday, January 04, 2016 02:54:40 PM Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 04.01.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andreas Färber: Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: > Please note that with the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:25:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: [snip] > I am not aware of anyone using the U-Boot API for grub these days, so > I'm not sure it's an incredibly useful goal. The main pain point distros > seem to have is to make something that "just works" on all systems out >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday, January 04, 2016 02:54:40 PM Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 04.01.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andreas Färber: > > > Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: > > >> Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 04.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Rini: > Please note that with the generic distro framework U-Boot will grok > https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ and > things Just Work. I setup a bunch of SD cards with Debian and Fedora > over holiday so I can drop them in whatever

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2016-01-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 26.12.15 20:34, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 05:27:48PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: This patch set is the result of pursuing this endeavor. >>> >>> Thanks, this is a very cool thing. >>> I meant to reply sooner, but Christmas got in the way. >>> - I am

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 03:31:03PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > > > > U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing > > everyone involved that only

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-27 Thread Leif Lindholm
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:10:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > So, my only "big" concern here is, are we as a community able to view > and implement the relevant parts of the UEFI spec (without having to > agree to a potentially complicated enough license to have to bug a > lawyer)? It's been a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 06:39:16PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:10:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > So, my only "big" concern here is, are we as a community able to view > > and implement the relevant parts of the UEFI spec (without having to > > agree to a potentially

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-26 Thread Leif Lindholm
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 05:27:48PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> This patch set is the result of pursuing this endeavor. > > > > Thanks, this is a very cool thing. > > I meant to reply sooner, but Christmas got in the way. > > > >> - I am successfully able to run grub2 and Linux EFI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-26 Thread Leif Lindholm
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > > U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing > everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM devices" we need to > support different

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-26 Thread Alexander Graf
On 26.12.15 16:31, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). >> >> U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing >> everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 Thread Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-25 19:50 GMT+03:00 Tom Rini : > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> > >> >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > >> > >> U-Boot is a great project for embedded

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 07:53:24PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > 2015-12-25 19:50 GMT+03:00 Tom Rini : > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 Thread Blibbet
On 12/22/2015 05:57 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > > U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing > everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM devices" we need to > support different configuration formats from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). >> >> U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing >> everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > > U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing > everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM devices" we need to > support different

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-22 Thread Matwey V. Kornilov
2015-12-22 16:57 GMT+03:00 Alexander Graf : > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > Santa, do you have u-boot rpm packed with the patches to test? -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov http://blog.matwey.name xmpp://0x2...@jabber.ru

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-22 Thread Alexander Graf
On 22.12.15 19:28, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > 2015-12-22 16:57 GMT+03:00 Alexander Graf : >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). >> > > Santa, do you have u-boot rpm packed with the patches to test? Once OBS has finished compiling, they should be available