On 04/08/2011 06:36 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 18:29 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
>> York,
>>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of
> mpc85xx.
ok - no "new" code for 83xx then.
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 18:29 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> York,
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> >>> I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of
> >>> mpc85xx.
> >> ok - no "new" code for 83xx then.
> >>> You are right the old code is in spd
York,
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
>>> I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of
>>> mpc85xx.
>> ok - no "new" code for 83xx then.
>>> You are right the old code is in spd_sdram.c and it is still in use for
>>> mpc83xx. Unless to adjust th
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:41 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> > I am sorry I totally ignored the subject with mpc83xx. I was thinking of
> > mpc85xx.
> ok - no "new" code for 83xx then.
> > You are right the old code is in spd_sdram.c and it is still in use for
> > mpc83xx. Unless to adjust the code, t
Kim,
>>> York,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ok - will give it a try tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> hmm - having a look at the Makefile it looks like I need
>> CONFIG_FSL_DDR2.
>>
>> This seems to pull in the "new" code ... without omitting the "old"
>> one
>>
>> in arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c
>>
>>
>
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:42 +0200, Schwarz,Andre wrote:
> York,
>
>
>
>
> "Schwarz,Andre" hat am 6. April 2011
> um 20:42 geschrieben:
>
> > York,
> >
> >
> >
> > ok - will give it a try tomorrow.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> hmm - having a look at the Makefile it looks like I need
> CONFI
York,
"Schwarz,Andre" hat am 6. April 2011 um 20:42
geschrieben:
> York,
>
> ok - will give it a try tomorrow.
>
>
hmm - having a look at the Makefile it looks like I need CONFIG_FSL_DDR2.
This seems to pull in the "new" code ... without omitting the "old" one
in arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc
York,
ok - will give it a try tomorrow.
Cheers,
André
York Sun hat am 6. April 2011 um 18:37 geschrieben:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:18 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> > Kim, York,
> >
> > >> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
> > >>
> > >> 1.
> > >> use SPD setup also
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:18 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> Kim, York,
>
> >> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
> >>
> >> 1.
> >> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
> >> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because SPD data
> >> is written during in-circuit
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:42 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> York,
> >>> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
> >>>
> >>> 1.
> >>> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
> >>> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because SPD data
> >>> is written during in-circuit/b
York,
>>> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
>>> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because SPD data
>>> is written during in-circuit/boundary-scan testing.
>> not sure I understand this - board with solde
Kim, York,
>> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
>>
>> 1.
>> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
>> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because SPD data
>> is written during in-circuit/boundary-scan testing.
> not sure I understand this - board with solder
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:52 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:49:49 +0200
> Andre Schwarz wrote:
>
> Cc'ing York Sun, who knows a little more about this stuff than I do.
>
> > I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
> >
> > 1.
> > use SPD setup also for soldere
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:49:49 +0200
Andre Schwarz wrote:
Cc'ing York Sun, who knows a little more about this stuff than I do.
> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
>
> 1.
> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because S
14 matches
Mail list logo
