Re: [U-Boot] net: macb: Fix build error for CONFIG_DM_ETH enabled

Hi Wenyou, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/622869/ was applied to u-boot-net.git. Thanks! -Joe ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] net: smsc95xx: Use correct get_unaligned functions

Hi Chris, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/647651/ was applied to u-boot-net.git. Thanks! -Joe ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-atmel/master -> u-boot/master

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:45:16PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 15.08.16 22:33, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:23:29PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > > > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> please pull the following changes into u-boot/master for v2016.09. It > >> contains

Re: [U-Boot] clk.h: inline clk_get_by_name()

Dear =?utf-8?q?Andreas_Bie=C3=9Fmann?=, writes: >Fix compile warning for non OF_CONTROL builds: > >---8<--- >In file included from /Volumes/devel/u-boot/drivers/gpio/atmel_pio4.c:10:0: >/Volumes/devel/u-boot/include/clk.h:107:12: warning: 'clk_get_by_name' defined >but

[U-Boot] test.py and tftp crc32 test?

Hey guys, Is anyone else running the crc32 tftp tests with test.py? I'm trying to do it locally but even with a 2MiB file it looks like somehow the crc32 is never captured in the output. I've already made sure that the crc32 value is in lowercase to match the U-Boot output and running the test

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] net: Stop including NFS overhead in defragment max

At least on bfin, this "specimen" is actually allocated in the BSS and wastes lots of memory in already tight memory conditions. Also, with the introduction of NFSv3 support, this waste got substantially larger. Just remove it. If a board needs a specific different defragment size, that board

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] net: nfs: Remove unused define

Unreferenced, so remove the noise. Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger --- net/nfs.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfs.h b/net/nfs.h index d69b422..2a1f4db 100644 --- a/net/nfs.h +++ b/net/nfs.h @@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ #define NFS_READ_SIZE 1024 /*

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] Clean up some NFS issues not related to v3 support

There were a few issues with related to NFS that existed previously. Clean those up before adding v3 support. Joe Hershberger (3): net: Stop including NFS overhead in defragment max net: nfs: Remove separate buffer for default name net: nfs: Remove unused define net/net.c | 10 +-

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v5] clk: at91: Add clock driver

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >The patch is referred to at91 clock driver of Linux, to make >the clock node descriptions in DT aligned with the Linux's. > >Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang >Reviewed-by: Simon Glass >--- >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,1/2] i2c: atmel: add i2c driver

Dear Songjun Wu, Songjun Wu writes: >Add i2c driver. > >Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu >Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher >Acked-by: Heiko Schocher >--- > >Changes in v3: >- Update the clk API. > >Changes in v2: >- Add code to get

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, RESEND, v3] dm: atmel: Add driver model support for the ehci driver

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >Add driver model support while retaining the existing legacy code. >This allows the driver to support boards that have converted to >driver model as well as those that have not. > >Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v11] mmc: atmel_sdhci: Convert to the driver model support

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >Convert the driver to the driver model while retaining the existing >legacy code. This allows the driver to support boards that have >converted to driver model as well as those that have not. > >Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: at91/dt: Add device tree for SAMA5D2 Xplained

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >Add device tree for SAMA5D2 Xplained board. > >Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang >--- > > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 3 + > arch/arm/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts | 200 ++ >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v7, 4/4] atmel: Bring in at91 pio4 device tree file and bindings

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >Bring in required device tree file and bindings from Linux. > >Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang >Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann >Reviewed-by: Simon Glass >--- > >Changes in

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v7, 3/4] pinctrl: at91-pio4: Add pinctrl driver

Dear Wenyou Yang, Wenyou Yang writes: >AT91 PIO4 controller is a combined gpio-controller, pin-mux and >pin-config module. The peripheral's pins are assigned through >per-pin based muxing logic. > >The pin configuration is performed on specific registers which >are shared

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v3,2/2] i2c: atmel: DT binding for i2c driver

Dear Songjun Wu, Songjun Wu writes: >DT binding documentation for atmel i2c driver. > >Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu >Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher >Acked-by: Heiko Schocher >--- > >Changes in v3: None >Changes in v2: >- Add

Re: [U-Boot] tpm: atmel_twi: Make compatible with DM I2C busses

Dear , Mario Six writes: >Commit 302c5db ("dm: tpm: Add Driver Model support for tpm_atmel_twi >driver") converted the Atmel TWI TPM driver itself to driver model, but >kept the legacy-style i2c_write/i2c_read calls. > >Commit 3e7d940 ("dm: tpm: Every TPM drivers should

Re: [U-Boot] test.py and tftp crc32 test?

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:59:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/15/2016 04:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >Hey guys, > > > >Is anyone else running the crc32 tftp tests with test.py? I'm trying to > >do it locally but even with a 2MiB file it looks like somehow the crc32 > >is never captured in

Re: [U-Boot] test.py and tftp crc32 test?

On 08/15/2016 04:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey guys, Is anyone else running the crc32 tftp tests with test.py? I'm trying to do it locally but even with a 2MiB file it looks like somehow the crc32 is never captured in the output. I've already made sure that the crc32 value is in lowercase to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Please pull u-boot-mmc

Hi Tom, On 08/12/2016 09:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:34:01PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > >> Dear Tom, >> >> Here is the mmc updates. >> - Supports the Driver model for atmel_sdhci. >> - Fixed the build error for omap_hsmmc. >> >> Could you pull these patch to

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] add pinctrl driver for rk3399

From: Kever Yang This patch set add the pinctrl driver for rk3399 and enable pinctrl for pwm module. Module with pinctrl driver support and with interrupt number and default pinctrl in dts node will get pinctrl initialized when driver probe. Module like pwm which without

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Add the programmable clock mode support

Hi Andreas, On 08/15/2016 01:17 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Dear Pantelis, > > On 20.06.16 03:58, Wenyou Yang wrote: >> Add the programmable clock mode for the clock generator. >> > > this one is delegated to me, but I think it is out of my scope. Could > you please have a look? I will be

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request, u-boot-tegra/master

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:38:45PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > Tom, > > Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into U-Boot/master. Thanks! > > All Tegra builds are OK, and Stephen's automated test system reports that > all tests pass. > > The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-net.git master

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:30:26PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Tom, > > The following changes since commit f4b0df1823921ad3bc39820466e9c5201cef6210: > > Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm (2016-08-12 16:00:50 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-atmel/master -> u-boot/master

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:04:24PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Hi Tom, > > please pull the following changes into u-boot/master for v2016.09. > > Andreas > > The following changes since commit f4b0df1823921ad3bc39820466e9c5201cef6210: > > Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm (2016-08-12

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] net: davinci_emac: Invalidate only the received portion of a buffer

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 05:23:01PM +, Karl Beldan wrote: > ATM when receiving a packet the whole buffer is invalidated, this change > optimizes this behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan Reviewed-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 6/6] xtensa: add support for the 'xtfpga' evaluation board

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:48PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > From: Chris Zankel > > The 'xtfpga' board is actually a set of FPGA evaluation boards that > can be configured to run an Xtensa processor. > > - Avnet Xilinx LX60 > - Avnet Xilinx LX110 > - Avnet Xilinx LX200

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, RFC:, v2] tools/env: ensure environment starts at erase block boundary

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 09:39:17PM +0200, Andreas Fenkart wrote: > 56086921 added support for unaligned environments access. > U-boot itself does not support this: > - env_nand.c fails when using an unaligned offset. It produces an > error in nand_erase_opts{drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c} > - in

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3] common: env_nand: Ensure that we have nand_info[0] prior to use

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > Now that nand_info[] is an array of pointers we need to ensure that it's > been populated prior to use. We may for example have ENV in NAND set in > configurations that run on boards with and without NAND (where default > env is fine

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Please pull u-boot-mmc

Hi All, On 08/12/2016 09:56 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > On 2016-08-12 14:48, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:12PM +0200, andr...@biessmann.de wrote: >>> On 2016-08-12 14:04, Tom Rini wrote: >>> >On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:34:01PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>> > >>> >>Dear

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/27] spi/sf: Updates on flash detection

Hi Jagan, On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 12 August 2016 at 23:28, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 12 August 2016 at 04:37, york sun wrote: >>> I saw some errors when compiling for arm. Compiling

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] fastboot: implement Kconfig

implement Kconfig for the 'fastboot' feature set Signed-off-by: Steve Rae --- It did not seem feasible to use the "moveconfig.py" tool -- mostly because some of these configurations use defines rather than actual values... In addition, implemented "config FASTBOOT"

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fastboot: move to Kconfig

- move bcm23550_w1d to Kconfig - move bcm28155_ap to Kconfig Signed-off-by: Steve Rae --- configs/bcm23550_w1d_defconfig | 8 configs/bcm28155_ap_defconfig | 8 include/configs/bcm23550_w1d.h | 8 include/configs/bcm28155_ap.h | 8

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 2/6] xtensa: add support for the xtensa processor architecture [2/2]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:44PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > From: Chris Zankel > > The Xtensa processor architecture is a configurable, extensible, > and synthesizable 32-bit RISC processor core provided by Tensilica, inc. > > This is the second part of the basic

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 1/6] xtensa: add support for the xtensa processor architecture [1/2]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:43PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > From: Chris Zankel > > The Xtensa processor architecture is a configurable, extensible, > and synthesizable 32-bit RISC processor core provided by Cadence. > > This is the first part of the basic architecture

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 4/6] xtensa: add core information for the dc233c processor

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:46PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > DC233C is an xtensa processor with full MMUv3 capable of running Linux. > Core information files are autogenerated from the processor description > and are not meant to be edited. > > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 5/6] xtensa: add core information for the de212 processor

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:47PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > DE212 is a general purpose xtensa processor without full MMU. > Core information files are autogenerated from the processor description > and are not meant to be edited. > > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] net: davinci_emac: Round up top tx buffer boundaries for dcache ops

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 05:23:00PM +, Karl Beldan wrote: > check_cache_range() warns that the top boundaries are not properly > aligned when flushing or invalidating the buffers and make these > operations fail. > > This gets rid of the remaining warnings: > CACHE: Misaligned operation at

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-atmel/master -> u-boot/master

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:04:24PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Hi Tom, > > please pull the following changes into u-boot/master for v2016.09. > > Andreas > > The following changes since commit f4b0df1823921ad3bc39820466e9c5201cef6210: > > Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm (2016-08-12

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, RFC] vexpress: Check TC2 firmware support before defaulting to nonsec booting

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:37:32PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > The firmware on TC2 needs to be configured appropriately before booting > in nonsec mode will work as expected, so test for this and fall back to > sec mode if required. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 3/6] xtensa: add core information for the dc232b processor

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:36:45PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > From: Chris Zankel > > DC232B is an xtensa processor with full MMUv2 capable of running Linux. > Core information files are autogenerated from the processor description > and are not meant to be edited. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [v2] mmc: send CMD0 before CMD1 for some MMC cards

Hi Yangbo, On 08/09/2016 08:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > Hi Yangbo, > > On 08/02/2016 04:33 PM, Yangbo Lu wrote: >> When the MMC framework was added in u-boot, the mmc_go_idle was >> added before mmc_send_op_cond_iter in function mmc_send_op_cond >> annotating that some cards seemed to need

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] mmc: mmc_legacy: fix the compiler error with disabled CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS

Hi, On 08/13/2016 02:20 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 11 August 2016 at 20:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> To prevent the compiler error, split the checking condition whether >> cfg->ops is NULL or not. >> It's more clearly, because it's not included in mmc_config structure >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Please pull u-boot-mmc

Dear Tom, Sorry for confusing..Could you pull these patches on u-boot/master? If there are other problems, let me know, plz. Rebased on latest u-boot/master. (Wenyou's patches was applied on u-boot-atmel.) Sorry for late.. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 01/13] cmd: fdt: Narrow the check for fdt addr

Hi, On 07/05/2016 05:26 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current code only checks if the fdt subcommand is fdt addr by checking > whether it starts with 'a'. > > Since this is a pretty widely used letter, narrow down that check a bit. > > Acked-by: Simon Glass > Acked-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4, 01/13] cmd: fdt: Narrow the check for fdt addr

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:52:04AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/05/2016 05:26 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The current code only checks if the fdt subcommand is fdt addr by checking > > whether it starts with 'a'. > > > > Since this is a pretty widely used letter, narrow down that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/27] spi/sf: Updates on flash detection

Hi Bin, On 16 August 2016 at 06:55, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On 12 August 2016 at 23:28, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 12 August 2016 at 04:37, york sun

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v4] x86: Add DFI BT700 BayTrail board support

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds support for the DFI BayTrail BT700 QSeven SoM installed > on the DFI Q7X-151 baseboard. The baseboard is equipped with the Nuvoton > NCT6102D Super IO chip providing the UART as console. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86: Add theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700 board support

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds support for the BayTrail based theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700 > board which uses the DFI BT700 BayTrail Qseven SoM on a custom baseboard. > The main difference to the DFI baseboard is, that it isn't equipped > with a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] serial: bcm283x_mu: Detect disabled serial device

On 15 August 2016 at 21:30, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 08/15/2016 09:48 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On the raspberry pi, you can disable the serial port to gain dynamic >> frequency >> scaling which can get handy at times. >> >> However, in such a configuration the

<    1   2