On 22:53 Mon 12 May , Norman Cheung wrote:
> I would like to know what is the quickest way to set up Atmel's SAM-ICE with
> the
> AT91SAM9260EK board to run GDB? My preference is to run under a linux host,
> but I can run under Windows if that is easier to setup.
>
> Any ideas, suggestions
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Steven,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> Q1:
>>
>> Both 5.9.5.1 (
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupDownload#Section_5.9.5.1.
>> ) and 5.9.5.6 (
>> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBoo
Hi everybody,
because we had to do some non-trivial last-minute changes to U-Boot
(like backing out a couple of problematic commits) I felt we need a
little more time to test the current code again.
Beause of that I decided to post-pone the release of v1.3.3 by a week
(or less, if we feel confide
Dear Steven,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Q1:
>
> Both 5.9.5.1 (
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupDownload#Section_5.9.5.1.
> ) and 5.9.5.6 (
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupDownload#Section_5.9.5.6.
> ) talk about booting image via network, but
On Monday 12 May 2008, Vasiliy Leonenko wrote:
> The last message with patch was sent by mistake.
> Correct patches were sent in two messages before.
Understood. I'll recheck this patchset after 1.3.3 is released.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
The watchdog on 8610 board is enabled by setting sw[6]
to on. Once enabled, the watchdog can not be disabled
by software. So feed the dog in u-boot is necessary for
normal operation.
Signed-off-by: Jason Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c | 14 ++
cpu/mpc86xx/
Dear Denk,
Q1:
Both 5.9.5.1 (
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupDownload#Section_5.9.5.1.
) and 5.9.5.6 (
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupDownload#Section_5.9.5.6.
) talk about booting image via network, but there are only few lines
of description about these commands
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD jcrosoft.com> writes:
>
> On 21:03 Mon 12 May , Kevin Greer wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Does anyone know if u-boot will work with the SMSC LAN8700 (same
> > interface
> >as LAN8187) Ethernet transceiver? Specifically I am trying to use it
> > with
I would like to know what is the quickest way to set up Atmel's SAM-ICE with the
AT91SAM9260EK board to run GDB? My preference is to run under a linux host,
but I can run under Windows if that is easier to setup.
Any ideas, suggestions or experiences.
Thanks,
Norman
--
I think that to support this feature a better tcp/ip stack should be
implemented...
At this point the question may be if we really need a real tcp/ip
stack... After all u-boot is a boot loader and not a full operating
system... or not?
luigi
Il giorno lun, 12/05/2008 alle 01.03 +0200, Wolfgang De
On May 11, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > you wrote:
>> From: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Currently, this code only deals with BATs 0-3, which makes
>> it useless on systems that support BATs 4-7. Add the
>> support for these registers.
>
> J
The "long" data types used so far in "common/memsize.c" cause
problems with larger memories, i. e. when accessing memory above
0x8000.
Pointed out by David Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:19:37 -0400
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
common/memsize.c |
On 21:03 Mon 12 May , Kevin Greer wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Does anyone know if u-boot will work with the SMSC LAN8700 (same interface
>as LAN8187) Ethernet transceiver? Specifically I am trying to use it with
>the Atmel AT91SAM9260 microcontroller using MII. I am developing a board
Hello,
Does anyone know if u-boot will work with the SMSC LAN8700 (same interface as
LAN8187) Ethernet transceiver? Specifically I am trying to use it with the
Atmel AT91SAM9260 microcontroller using MII. I am developing a board similar
to the AT91SAM9260-EK evaluation kit and would like to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Reuse the existing DIU driver in board/freescale/common.
>
> Signed-off-by: York Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/ads5121/Makefile |7 ++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied to "ads5121" branch in u-boot-testing rep
Hi, all,
The FCC1 Ethernet can generate ARP packets but fails to answer the host.
tcpdump message:
"14:00:34.770939 arp who-has 172.16.1.9 tell 172.16.1.53
14:00:34.773488 arp reply 172.16.1.9 is-at 00:13:72:c0:19:31 (oui Unknown)"
I am porting u-boot to a customized MPC8272 board. I configure
Wolfgang,
Please find the v2 patch for the ads5121 Makefile in the following mail.
Regards,
York
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/
Reuse the existing DIU driver in board/freescale/common.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/ads5121/Makefile |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/ads5121/Makefile b/board/ads5121/Makefile
index 8ace8a1..f4dacce 100644
--- a/board/
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 01:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > include $(TOPDIR)/config.mk
> >
> > +$(shell mkdir -p $(OBJTREE)/board/freescale/common)
> > +
> > LIB= $(obj)lib$(BOARD).a
>
> I'm missing some rule to remove that directory for "make clean" or
> "make distclean" ?
>
No
On Sat, 10 May 2008 04:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
klibusel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the polled uboot ethernet driver on
> MPC8360erdk. I have trouble sending and receiving
> ethernet packets. I have configured the interface as
> a generic MII and it detects the linking coming up.
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I made the patch that applied your comment.
> This patch skips PCI bridge ( Class code : 0x06XX).
>
> Could you check this patch?
Thanks - but note that this will not make it in the v1.3.3 release in
any case.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DEN
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The manual is not so clear. I want to boot from a remote image and
> mount remote root filesystem. It seems i've done the server side
> setup respecting to the manual, but for u-boot usage ( target side )
> to do this, i am not so clear. Would anyon
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ATMEL_LCD)
> +#include
> +#include
> +extern nand_info_t nand_info[];
> +#endif
nand_info is declared in nand.h. No need to redeclare it.
-Scott
-
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 6:49 AM
> To: Sascha Hauer
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch] U-Boot-V2:
> IntroduceCONFIG_ARCH_HAS_INIT_
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:56:08AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Sascha,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:44 AM
> > To: Menon, Nishanth
> > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] U-Boot-V2
She will give you fantasies you will never forget http://www.plauens.com/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priori
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:44 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] U-Boot-V2: ARM: Makefile cleaup
>
> > +AFLAGS += -msoft-float -Os
>
> Assemblers don't
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:23:48AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Does the following:
> * Add cleanup flags which will allow gcc to delete function sections which
> are unused.
> * mark the initcall sections and uboot cmds, symbols as being retained (else
> gcc will kill those too).
>
> Signed-
On Mon, 05 May 2008 11:34:20 -0400
Larry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Nobuhiro, Stefan, and everyone,
>
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. My mail reader thinks your
> patch is part of your signature, so I missed it the first time around.
>
> I did a quick check using
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:28 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Patch] U-Boot-V2: parser.c sparse cleanup
>
> > -#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_BOOTD)
> > +#if de
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:20:59AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Does the following:
> * Remove duplicated global flags -Wall, -nostdinc, -fno-common
> * Introduce -ffixed-r8 for CFLAGS
> * Add AFLAGS
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: u-boot-v2.git/arch/arm/Makefi
> -Original Message-
> From: Menon, Nishanth
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:25 AM
> To: 'Sascha Hauer'
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Patch 1/2] U-Boot-V2: ARM: Makefile cleaup
>
> Sascha,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
Is there any support available on u-boot for this processor (MSP8110).
This processor incorporates a MIPS34K core.
Rgds,
Achilles
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year
Sascha,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:22 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] U-Boot-V2: ARM: Makefile cleaup
>
> > * Introduce -ffixed-r8 for CFLAGS
>
> Why? U-Boo
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:24:43AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> This patch cleans up the parser error seen during simple parser compilation.
> Please note that CFG_CMD_BOOTD is not defined at the moment, but leaving it
> for addition at a later point of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:20:59AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Does the following:
> * Remove duplicated global flags -Wall, -nostdinc, -fno-common
> * Introduce -ffixed-r8 for CFLAGS
Why? U-Boot v1 uses to keep a pointer to global data here, but in v2
there is no global data anymore.
Sascha
This patch cleans up the parser error seen during simple parser compilation.
Please note that CFG_CMD_BOOTD is not defined at the moment, but leaving it for
addition at a later point of time.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: u-boot-v2.git/common/parser.c
=
Does the following:
* Add cleanup flags which will allow gcc to delete function sections which are
unused.
* mark the initcall sections and uboot cmds, symbols as being retained (else
gcc will kill those too).
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: u-boot-v2.git/arch/arm/Makef
Does the following:
* Remove duplicated global flags -Wall, -nostdinc, -fno-common
* Introduce -ffixed-r8 for CFLAGS
* Add AFLAGS
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: u-boot-v2.git/arch/arm/Makefile
===
--- u-boot
Hi All,
This is an ARM Makefile clean up series. This consists of:
* arm-makefile modifications to remove repeated global flags, enable ASM files
also to compile, sparse compilation to take place.
* arm-makefile modification to enable GCC flags to automatically strip out
unused functions and data
This is Kconfig cleanup patch (not all configurations will use CFI, SPI, RAMFS
and DEVFS).
* Enable CFI and SPI drivers menuconfig option to be able to disable them in
menuconfig.
* Introduce capability to disable ramfs and devfs.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: u-boot-
Title: casainho invites you to discover Jamendo
casainho invites you to discover Jamendo
Hello
I’m registered on Jamendo, a website with free, legal and unlimited music that you can listen to and download.
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> Add logbuffer to reserved LMB areas to prevent initrd allocation
>>> from overlaping with it.
>>>
>>> Make sure to use correct logbuffer base address.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL P
Hi,
The manual is not so clear. I want to boot from a remote image and
mount remote root filesystem. It seems i've done the server side
setup respecting to the manual, but for u-boot usage ( target side )
to do this, i am not so clear. Would anyone please show me simple
steps? Thanks in advanc
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:10:53PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> The following patch removes global compilation flags duplicated in
> sandbox makefile.
> This also works-around a probable compiler issue noted in my mail here:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=48193193.305
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:19:35PM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Sascha,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:13 AM
> > To: Menon, Nishanth
> > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Patch] U-Boot-V2: R
Hi All
The last message with patch was sent by mistake.
Correct patches were sent in two messages before.
Best Regards
Vasiliy
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's excit
"I tried a more complex code that uses a periodic interval timer to do a delay
on flash LED code however this code does not work, It comes back to U-Boot
shell with return value of 1. What can I be doing wrong?" -- to answer my own
questions, the page
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/MyStandal
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 00:43 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > If you do not like the way it is fixed, then remove git-commit
> > c0559be371b2a64b1a817088c3308688e2182f93 which causes this regression
> > for the time being, to buy more time to fix it i
49 matches
Mail list logo
