They only differ in the init function.
This also adds the missing watchdog support for the PL011.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Added to GNATS database as unassigned-patches/3
Responsible:patch-coord
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To:
References:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I think nabble wont truncate or line wrap my mail. So i am giving it a try.
Don't think - test before sending to public mailing lists.
...
+#define RTC_WRITE_REG(addr, val)(*(volatile unsigned int
*)(CFG_RTC_PL031_BASE + (addr)) = (val))
Hi,
2008/7/19 Rodrigo Valentino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Folks,
I'm working on a device from ST Micro Eletronics model ST7100, and i'm
looking for a way to improve redirect output console to device ttyUSB,
because the serial output
I suppose that you use U-Boot which STMicro releases.
You had
Yes, you're right. it's complicit.
However it's not related with this patch. It happens always at current
source.
Next time it will fix it.
The kernel implementation is similar. You'll probably have to fix it there
also.
cheers,
Fathi
Hi,
Sorry for that.
Now i have generated the patch using below command. Update me if this is not
correct
$ git format-patch -p -o ../ -C -M -N --summary --stat=80 --no-color
--signoff master workingbranch
TIA
Regards
Gururaja
- Add ARM AMBA PL031 RTC Support
- Call rtc_init function to
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:15:31PM -0500, Khandenahally, Raghavendra wrote:
Introduce a common board header for functions
required by platform.S This will prevent
redundancies of multiple board-xyz.h files all
doing the same thing.
I would prefer another patch. I didn't watch out when
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:19:06PM -0500, Khandenahally, Raghavendra wrote:
This patch adds support for Beagle Board.
Beagle board from TI is a development platform
based on TI's OMAP3530 silicon.
You can find more about Beagle Board here: www.beagleboard.org
More on OMAP3530 (including
Move to one place
I just compiled test. Please check other NAND users.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
index 05ba375..ce9d937 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
@@ -19,6 +19,20 @@
Sascha,
Sascha Hauer said the following on 07/22/2008 02:21 AM:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:15:31PM -0500, Khandenahally, Raghavendra wrote:
I would prefer another patch. I didn't watch out when board/omap was
introduced. In fact, omap is not a board and it's gonna be a mess when
Sascha Hauer said the following on 07/22/2008 02:42 AM:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:19:06PM -0500, Khandenahally, Raghavendra wrote:
This function is unnecessarely big. The two arguments of MUX_VAL could
go together in one 32bit value. This way you could do a loop around an
array of mux
Hello All,
2008/7/22 os user [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
I use Atmel AT91SAM9260-EK boards, arm-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.4. After I
pulled the latest code from git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git, I found
that the [EMAIL PROTECTED]/env_common.c can not work well. The root
cause is in
If CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT is set the flag GD_FLG_RELOC is usually never
set, because relocation to RAM is actually never done by U-boot itself.
However, several pieces of code check if this flag is set at some time.
So, to make sure this flag is set on boards skipping relocation, this
is
Hello Wolfgang,
Has the problem boards been fixed yet? If so please resubmit commit
c0559be3.
So what *is* the state of this?
Oops, due to my summer holidays I missed this one...
But no problem, I have a decent fix for the AT91 boards ready, and can
post it when I am back at work.
I only
On 14:20 Tue 22 Jul , Remy Bohmer wrote:
If CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT is set the flag GD_FLG_RELOC is usually never
set, because relocation to RAM is actually never done by U-boot itself.
However, several pieces of code check if this flag is set at some time.
So, to make sure this flag
Hello Jean-Christophe,
+static int reloc_init(void)
+{
+ gd-flags |= GD_FLG_RELOC;
you need to return 0 at least
Oops, You are right... (I forgot it somehow)
Thanks!
Remy
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the
If CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT is set the flag GD_FLG_RELOC is usually never
set, because relocation to RAM is actually never done by U-boot itself.
However, several pieces of code check if this flag is set at some time.
So, to make sure this flag is set on boards skipping relocation, this
is
Andy Fleming wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:17 PM, richardretanubun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if the miiphy command support for QE UEC is already
merged into u-boot on some tree.
The last info I have on this patch is on this posting:
Hi
I am fairly new to Uboot. I am having trouble running the make command
from the u-boot-1.1.4/tools # prompt.
When I do a make, this is the error I get
Makefile:108: /config.mk: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/config.mk'. Stop.
I am told by one of the developers
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:11:12PM +0530, Vijay Nikam wrote:
Hello All,
I have mpc8313erdb evaluation board ... now I am trying to boot it
from NAND Flash (32MB Flash) ... I am able to get u-boot prompt ...
but the linux kernel is not booting and so filesystem is not mounting
...
It says
Is the CFG_MONITOR_BASE the location where the processor reads the first
instruction after reset ? is that right ?
any clarification would be appreciated.
thanks !
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin
Support for the adsvix was originally provided by Applied Data Systems (ADS),
inc., now EuroTech, Inc. The board never shipped aside from some sample
boards.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Filipi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian
--
Linux Software Engineer | EuroTech, Inc. | www.eurotech-inc.com
---
I have an amcc glacier eval board, which came with u-boot installed,
with working ethernet. The amcc folks told me that the u-boot was
built off the denx 1.3.3 repository, so I cloned
git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git and built glacier. It comes up all right,
but reports
Net: No ethernet found.
Rugunda, Solo wrote:
Hi
I am fairly new to Uboot. I am having trouble running the make command
from the u-boot-1.1.4/tools # prompt.
When I do a make, this is the error I get
Makefile:108: /config.mk: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/config.mk'. Stop.
Hi
Thanks Jerry and Nathan
So I built the image by running the Make with the correct cross compiler
from the uboot prompt.
The file produced is u-boot.bin.gz
Now, How do I put this image onto my board and in the right location?
Thanks
Solo
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Van Baren
On 14:49 Tue 22 Jul , Rugunda, Solo wrote:
Thanks Jerry and Nathan
So I built the image by running the Make with the correct cross compiler
from the uboot prompt.
The file produced is u-boot.bin.gz
u-boot.bin.gz? are you sure?
It's suppose to produce a elf u-boot and u-boot.bin.
You
You are right. After taking a closer look, the binaries generated are
u-boot.bin, u-boot.srec and u-boot ,not sure why the u-boot.bin.gz is in
there tho.
Anyway, it looks like I have the correct binary files. Which one do I
burn to flash? And how do I go about putting it on the board? (new to
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:59 AM, vb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an amcc glacier eval board, which came with u-boot installed,
with working ethernet. The amcc folks told me that the u-boot was
built off the denx 1.3.3 repository, so I cloned
git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git and built glacier.
i'm working on taishan ppc440gx.
now here's what i noticed. snippet of u-boot.bin opened with a hex editor.
fffb : 27051956 552d426f 6f742031 2e322e30 '..VU-Boot 1.2.0
fffc000f : 20284a75 6c203232 20323030 38202d20 (Jul 22 2008 -
fffc001f : 31343a31 363a3037 2900
ok, looks like 0x27051956 is uboot magic number (from start.S)
why is the CFG_MONITOR_BASE points to the magic number ?
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Fundu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Fundu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot.bin
To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tuesday,
Hi all,
We're having a rough week with our Freescale MDS boards.
I've just submitted a service request through
Freescale's online system. However, I figured others
(eg. Kim, and Timur) might be interested in the following
problem:
We have an MPC8349E-MDS-PB and an MPC8349EA-MDS-PB that we
are
Hello,
My name is Nathan. I'm new to u-boot, but you may have recently seen a post
asking for imx31 litekit help. I've received some really good help from
other mx31ads or mx31pdk users, but haven't heard from anyone using the
litekit. Is there anyone out there with specific knowledge of the eval
Hello,
this patch fixes the following warnings, if compiling
u-boot with ide support.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] u-boot]$ make -s all
cmd_ide.c:827: Warnung: weak declaration of `ide_outb' after first use results
in unspecified behavior
cmd_ide.c:839: Warnung: weak declaration of `ide_inb' after first
32 matches
Mail list logo
