[U-Boot-Users] Fwd: [U-Boot] EP93XX Uboot support

as a start to port to my target. > > /alessandro > ___ > U-Boot mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Ph

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to Handel Non-Continuous Memory Regions

Jerry, Excellent Idea! I will test it right away. -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to Handel Non-Continuous Memory Regions

ends up giving me region sizes of 8MBytes. U-Boot runs in the first region, and we down load into the second region. If the down load is larger than the region size it gets corrupted. So the thought is to enable the MMU to do the address translation. Or is there another way to handle this? -- S

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to Handel Non-Continuous Memory Regions

cardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stuart > > I don't know waht architechture that you are using, but if you have an > mmu maybe you can set it to have a virtual memory space contigous. > > Best regards > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Stuart Wood >

[U-Boot-Users] How to Handel Non-Continuous Memory Regions

an 8MBytes? -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Bu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with oobsize=512

512 bytes. > > What do you think? > > Claudio > > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:18 PM > To: Spinelli, Claudio (Claudio) > Cc: uboot > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with

Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with oobsize=512

Stuart > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:01 PM > To: Spinelli, Claudio (Claudio) > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with > oobsize=512

Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with oobsize=512

nal info: > 1 page = 4k + 218 bytes > 1 block = (4k +218 bytes) x 64 pages = (256k +13k) bytes > > Device total size = 8,608Mbit > > Thanks > > Claudio > > > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturda

Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with oobsize=512

NAND Flash so I don't know if it differers from the SLC types. I do now that both Large and Small page SLC Flash is well supported. Stuart On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Spinelli, Claudio (Claudio) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MICRON MT29F8G08AAA > > -Original Message

Re: [U-Boot-Users] nand_oobinfo for 1Gbyte nand flash with oobsize=512

> U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with root JFFS2 on NAND Flash

and nand controller that is used. There is no nand controller, the interface is bit banged with software ecc. The ECC data seems to be loaded in the oob bytes 0-3, 6, 7 witch should not conflict right? -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phon

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with root JFFS2 on NAND Flash

27;ve set the partition tables to be the same between the two, but I'm not sure what else needs to synchronized. MTD version? -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with root JFFS2 on NAND Flash

other thoughts? Stuart On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Grant Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/13/08 7:45 AM, Stuart Wood wrote: >> I'm having some new problems with my jffs2 root file system when it is >> mounted the first time from small page nand flash. >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Ethernet stopped working after upgrading from 1.1.5 to 1.3.3

, Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuart Wood wrote: >> >> It was pulled together from the cirrus logic Linux distribution posts >> done on the linux-cirrus mailing list as far as I know. I was not >> around when it was initially put together, and the

[U-Boot-Users] Ethernet stopped working after upgrading from 1.1.5 to 1.3.3

with how the CPU specific files should be laid out. Did the config commands change to set up Ethernet? The Ethernet driver for the chip is under cpu/arm920t/ep93xx/eth.c Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester,

[U-Boot-Users] Problems with root JFFS2 on NAND Flash

2_RTIME=y # CONFIG_JFFS2_RUBIN is not set Any thoughts on what might be wrong would be appriciated! Thanks -- Stuart Wood - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to

[U-Boot-Users] Problems with root JFFS2 on NAND Flash

entry '/etc': no parent directory! -rw-r--r-- 1 stuart stuart 2736128 2008-06-13 09:52 /home/stuart/ArmLinux/buildroot/rootfs.arm_nofpu.jffs2 /sbin/ldconfig -r /home/stuart/ArmLinux/buildroot/build_arm_nofpu/root 2>/dev/null I'm using u-boot 1.3.3 to load the image like this: --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds)

/ > ___ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technolog

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]serial_pl010.c - Add watchdog support

Adding watch dog support signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c b/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c index 417b6ae..134ed09 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c +++ b/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ /* Should be fairly sim

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]jffs2_1pass.c - Adding watchdog support

Adds watchdog support. signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c index a330438..9ff8e12 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]env_nand.c Added bad block management for environment variables

off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c index 49742f5..508d7a4 100644 --- a/common/env_nand.c +++ b/common/env_nand.c @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ /* + * (C) Copyright 2008 + * Stuart Wood, Lab X Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * * (C) Co

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]env_nand.c Added bad block management for environment variables

Modified to check for bad blocks and to skipping over them when CFG_ENV_RANGE has been defined. CFG_ENV_RANGE must be larger than CFG_ENV_SIZE and aligned to the NAND flash block size. signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]env_nand.c Added bad block management for environment variables

..3ee42e0 100644 --- a/common/env_nand.c +++ b/common/env_nand.c @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ /* + * (C) Copywrite 2008 + * Stuart Wood, Lab X Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * * (C) Copyright 2004 * Jian Zhang, Texas Instruments, [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -53,6 +56,10 @@ #error CONFIG_INFERNO not sup

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Very slow JFFS2 scan time and directory listing

file it goes back to the begining of the fs and starts searching for the next without remembering what it has already seen. Does this make sense? Would caching the inodes in RAM help? -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207

[U-Boot-Users] Very slow JFFS2 scan time and directory listing

Hi All, It's taking an extremely long time to do a directory listing using the 'ls' command with JFFS2. Its taking nearly a minute to scan the file system and then about 1 second to print each line. What is could be the cause of this, and is there any way to speed this up current

[U-Boot-Users] What causes a 'dirty' revision?

Hi All, What is U-Boot looking for or not finding to cause it decide the build is dirty? Is it similar to what Linux is using? Thanks -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707

Re: [U-Boot-Users] problem with upgrading u-boot version

nting the code from being compiled? > > --- > Gary Jennejohn > -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 - This SF.net

[U-Boot-Users] problem with upgrading u-boot version

home/stuart/ArmLinux/u-boot_git/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c:50: undefined reference to `board_nand_init' make: *** [u-boot] Error 1 Thanks -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Status of the Yaffs patches?

Thanks, I'll look into it. but I will need to do quite a bit of work to bring our u-boot up to the current release. We're about 2 years old and running on an EP9302 Arm processor. I'm not sure what we're built off from, so extracting our work will take some time. I very much want to move to YAFFS

[U-Boot-Users] Status of the Yaffs patches?

Hi All, Can anyone give me an update on the status of integrating YAFFS binary image reading and writing into U-Boot? -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM