Alas! I have to return with my tail 'tween my legs!
---
IBM P615
AIX 5.2
Universe 10.1.2
2 cpu
---
Test Data : 500,000 invoice records,
a trigger with a RE
Funny that. My catalog verb is identical, but I think it is the actual
wording of the statementthat is different..
I've been
ICAT {file} {program name}
where as you've been
CAT {file} {*program name} {program name}
-Original Message-
From: John Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Tony Gravagno wrote:
> Can I just turn off smm while I'm in development? How?
No, you can't I'm afraid.
Have you tried CATALOGing everything LOCAL DIRECT while you are in
development? Or will that just not work with UniObjects?
Cheers,
Ken
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To u
I'm no Wintegrate person, so I can't say what's happening there, but I
have seen terminal types send an ASCII 127 (DEL) for a BS. To the
terminal it looks perfectly normal but to the command interpreter it's
totally whacked. What does PTERM -DISPLAY show?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
>I've tried the !NEWPCODE and !NEWVERSION ...
Sorry, I missed that detail in my previous response. The problem I
usually have w/ NEWPCODE is the syntax. You might try using FIBCDFN
in the AE editor and see if that cause
Have you checked out NEWPCODE instead of NEWVERSION?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Unidata shared memory and catalogs
Platform is Unidata 6.0
Platform is Unidata 6.0 PE over WinXP.
I've been having a hard time doing development on subroutines when the main
calling programs are running on active processes. This isn't live code,
it's all development, but I'm trying to avoid stop/restarting the main code
every time I change a subroutine.
I've been having a heck of a time at ECL on Unidata PE 6.0 with AccuTerm 2k2
- all over WinXP Pro. I'm not sure of which terminal emulation is best, or
even how to check/set the term type in Unidata. "term vt100" doesn't return
a confirmation and "term" just returns "A,B,C,D" help with nothing ab
I've heard once that UniVerse goes down to char(246) as system delimiters.
Don't know where it came from. (Probably this list)
I would love to have the ability to access those values with the normal
tools of Basic or UniObjects, but I guess this is one case where there show
through.
Martin Scholl
But Debra, all you need is an "A" below the "B", on your (ahem, ahem),
and then you'll have a TBA tattoo ("To Be Announced"). You can have a
lucrative career doing commercials for TV Guide.
"It was like experiencing a nuclear explosion in a very small place." -
Loni Anderson, describing having sex
LOL
Or when you have to take your keyboard apart and dry it with the wife's
blow-dryer because of the drool that accumulated during slumber. Gotta love
those imprints on the face
Ok, we'd better knock it off before IBM declares this thread dead! heh
heh.
-Original Message-
From:
" Relocation will not be considered - we are seeking a local candidate. "
Does this mean "we don't pay relocation expenses" or that if I relocate to
Denver at my own expense I won't be considered ?
The latter seems a bit harsh - can you do that in the "land of the free" ?
Or do you perhaps have
Strange. My trigger was the same; simple return with AFTER INSERT OR
UPDATE OR DELETE. System load was very low as it was the development
server I was uding.
My basic program selected the whole file (70,000 records) then simply
read each one and wrote each one so the trigger was called even though
Since I haven't done this in some time. I cant remember how to do this. I
added a printer that I now wish to delete. I am using a dumb terminal to do
this via the SYSADM.MENU menu. There appears to be menu options at the top
File, Action, Help. I guess I need the magic keystroke for Action.
Ho
and when you have keyboard imprints on your forehead...it's really gone to
far..I am still trying to get rid of the "T" on my forehead and the "B" on
my nose.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Glen B
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:46 PM
T
I think codingitis is the cause. Time to lay off the keyboard for a
while, man. You know, semi-colons start to disappear after 6 hours of
continuous coding. Any higher amount of time can cause strange things to
happen. I remember starting during mid-day and missing night-time once,
while program
>Problem: FMTS is supposed to FMT each field of a given dynamic array.
>It appears to be wrong if source data in a field of the array contains
CHAR(247).
If you look at the DOCs for REMOVE (for example), it indicates that the
lowest system delimiter is CHAR(248), and that is true with REMOVE.
How
Yes, but I understand Chuck's point. The Ad didn't say WHICH Denver,
Colorado. Did they mean the one in Canada or the one in Mexico?
"Faith is a bird singing in the darkness, anticipating the dawn." -
Anonymous.
David Hanwell
ACE-INA, Information Technology
215.640.2212
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My with and without scores were 78 seconds and 80 seconds respectively.
Yes, without took longer.
It was 1000 updates, the same record set, and a simple RETURN after the
parameters. The trigger was AFTER INSERT UPDATE DELETE.
Maybe the INSERTS take longer or system load may have been radically
diff
Our catalog verb looks like this:
R.MIPAHC>CT VOC ICAT
ICAT
0001 V
0002 CATALOG
0003 I
0004 BDGZ
0005 catalog
0006 INFORMATION.FORMAT
If I use the regular catalog, it wants to place the item in the voc with
*...* If the ICAT is used, it lands in GLOBAL.CATDIR as a single item
like *GLOBAL.ROU
Hi Rod,
I too have had the 'pleasure' of F and A correlatives.
Once upon a time, a nice man named Dick Pick, who created Pick basic, issued
a challenge. He said that there was no way in native Pick to access the
last value of a multivalued field and challenged anyone to find a way.
Enter Me. 'A
> From: Results [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> William,
> Unless I missed it, there's no locational information in the
> post, which makes
> >Relocation will not be considered - we are seeking a local candidate.
> difficult.
I thought the same, but check the subject :-)
Seems like a really great o
Oh gosh, read the subject? Denver CO sounds like a location to me :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Results
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 10:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Senior Pick Programmer position Denver, Colorado
Charles,
Take a look at the subject line - it appears to be in Denver.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Results
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Senior Pick Programmer posit
Chuck
Did you have nourishment today? Eat some carrots lately? Have your glasses
on? ;-) It's in the subject line..."Denver"
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Results
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Denver, Colorado isnt specific enough?
Jeff Schasny | Denver, Colorado, USA | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Allen,
Universe does have I-descriptors, but the programmer was trying to build
an F-correlative (from old PICK) to do the task.
-- Rod Hills
-Original Message-
From: Allen E. Elwood (CA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
William,
Unless I missed it, there's no locational information in the post, which
makes
Relocation will not be considered - we are seeking a local candidate.
difficult.
--
- Charles Barouch
(718) 762-3884 x 1 - Key Ally Voice Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Consulting services
[EMAIL
Do you have NLS installed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksejs
Truhans
Sent: 01 September 2004 18:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] UV: FMT and FMTS processing of CHAR(247) differs
Dear All!
Please, shed some light on the strang
Dear All!
Please, shed some light on the strange behaviour of UV BASIC FMTS function.
Environment: UV 9.6.2.6 and 9.6.2.1 on HPUX 11i on PA-RISC 8xxx.
Problem: FMTS is supposed to FMT each field of a given dynamic array.
It appears to be wrong if source data in a field of the array contains
CHAR(2
Hi
Does anyone know how I could run a SELECT to a list, but maintain
multivalues on a single line?
ie.
Statement is SELECT CUSTOMER @ID ADDRESS
My ADDRESS field is multivalued for two lines, so in the savedlist I
see:
RECID
ADDRESSLINE1
ADDRESSLINE2
RECID
ADDRESSLINE1
ADDRESSLINE2
RECID
ADDRES
No. It has Itypes too, just that some of us love to code in a manner that
pre-dates Itypes. And for the challenge too! ;-) Oh. Or we have existing
stuff already coded to support.
At 12:40 PM 9/1/2004, you wrote:
Wow, in Unidata this would be an "I descriptor" that would just be
SUM(WO.COMP.Q
Hello!
We have had problems with big UV 64-bit files on HPUX11i PA-RISC.
As far as I remember, it is UV version 9.6.2.1 or 9.6.1.smth, where a
static hashed file
bigger than 4GB could be killed by modifying a record (beyond the 4GB
border?).
That is, if one is just adding records to a file it is
Wow, in Unidata this would be an "I descriptor" that would just be
SUM(WO.COMP.QTY) in attr 2 of the dict. Guess UV doesn't have I desc's?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 08:37
To: [EMAIL PR
Trust Company of America, a leading provider of financial services
nationwide,
has an immediate opening for a Senior Multivalue Database Programmer /
Analyst.
The ideal candidate for this position will have broad knowledge of
multi-value
database architecture and management. You will work as a me
Hi Rod,
I assist my customers who run both UniVerse and UniData in the Pick
flavor and created the following dict item to SUM the values from another
record:
0001: I (SQL)}}NUMERIC}Y}}}
0002: SUM(TRANS('WO-BOM',F0,3,'X'))
0003: MD4
0004: Test SUM
0005: 8R
0006: S
0007:
WO List val
The translate returns MV data with spaces.
Dick Kryka
Director of Applications
CCCS of Greater Denver, Inc.
Paragon Financial Services
303-632-2226
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Hills
Sent: Wednesday, September 01
Thanks Rick!
This won't keep the program from going to debugger if someone did a FV=""
but at least I can weed out probably 90% of the goofs. And since this
subroutine is designed to be used by programmers, it won't be a huge
problem, but I was just trying to make it bullet proof.
Allen E. Elwoo
Well, I do know that the Internal data error message (at 9.6) is generated
within the file handling subsystem when blink values are mucked up;
interesting that no information pertaining to this type of error is
displayed so one might postulate this isn't the issue.
This message can also be gene
My suggestion would be to use the Prime style I-descriptors instead of the
cryptic Pick style correlative.
With an I-descriptor you could simply SUM the field. If you could decipher
what your correlative does (my guess is reading field 8 of the TWIP file),
an appropriate I-descriptor could be
Yes, this is the way it works, unfortunately. What we ended up doing
was to change att 8 in WO.COMP.QTY to
F;0(TWIP;X;;8);(G0 1);0(TWIP;X;;8);(G1 1);0(TWIP;X;;8);(G2
1);.;+;+;+;+ etc
-Dianne
Rod Hills wrote:
We are trying to do a very basic PICK technique of summing a multi-value field
Hi Glen,
This is the output when we first ran across the problem:
0008 Program "FIS00200": Line 551, Internal data error.
0009 Program "FIS00200": Line 555, Internal data error.
0010 Program "FIS00200": Line 555, WRITE failure.
Line 551 is a MATREADU from the file, and line 555 is a MATWRITE to
We are trying to do a very basic PICK technique of summing a multi-value field
in a F-type correlative.
However, it appears uniVerse is not putting the multi-values onto it's "stack"
as inividual values, but rather as one entry with the value markers replaced
with blanks.
Below are two dictionary
The @select item should be a list of FIELD (i.e. dictionary entry) names not record
ID's
-original message-
[snip]
Below is the setup:
>CT DICT BLAH @SELECT
@SELECT
0001 PH
0002 INTO ALTER <- the records I want
Jeff Schasny | Denver, Colorado, USA | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I have a version of 9.6 (and beyond!) running here on an hp 11.11i with a
few large files that exceed 4 gig (one is around 20 gig) with no problems;
note that these files aren't exercised all that much as I don't really play
around with this stuff much anymore. Additionally, we have a number of
Hi,
Thanks for all the responses.
Ulimit, is set to unlimited so that shouldn't be the problem. Our unix
support people cant find any other HPUX kernel parameter that would affect
the maximum file size. Glen's recollection is correct - HPUX support file
sizes up to 128 terabytes.
It is looking i
If I remember correctly, when I was implementing the 64-bit file system in
universe, the HPUX max file size was somewhere around 128 Terabytes, but I
can't locate my notes from that far back to verify that number. It
certainly sounds like something in the OS is stopping you, such as ulimit
(as
IF ASSIGNED(file.var) then
* Check for locks...
END
Works. You can also do NOT(ASSIGNED(file.var)) as well. This works on
both "regular" and "file" variables.
Hth
Colin Alfke
Calgary, Alberta
-Original Message-
From: Allen E. Elwood (CA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 3
I would check your ulimit settings.
On both HP-UX 10.20 and 11 we have a setting of 4194303.
Only problem with that is that IIRC this figure is in blocks - which would
mean 2GB.
Robert Paterson
Technology Support Manager
www.epicor.com
Tel.: +44 (1344) 468231
Cell: +44 (7799) 348513
Fax: +44 (13
> Surely if the standard Universe 32bit max file size is 2gb
> (2147483648 Bytes)
>
> Then the 64bit would be 4gb (2147483648*2 Bytes)
I guess more in the neighbourhood of 2^63 = 9223372036854775808 bytes
but nevermind, the limit for a 32 bit system on 2gb is stupid as you could
have used the
Hi Bob,
A 64bit file has a very large capacity. The 64 bit number is binary so
every bit = 1 greater power of 2. Whereas 2,147,483,648 = 2^31 then
9,223,372,036,854,775,808 = 2^63. A very big number indeed. The reason
it is 31 and 63 is that the leftmost bit generally signifies the sign of
the num
I forgot to mention - the FILEVAR will be considered to be ASSIGNED=TRUE
even if you've simply done a FILEVAR="" somewhere in the program. The
key to this is never use the file handle variable name except for the
ASSIGNED or the various file-handling verbs.
Rick Ramsey
Healthpac Cumputer Systems
I believe this will work for you in D3: IF ASSIGNED(FILEVAR) . . .
where FILEVAR is the file handle variable used in the OPEN statement
Rick Ramsey
Healthpac Cumputer Systems
Savannah, GA
-Original Message-
From: Allen E. Elwood (CA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31,
Surely if the standard Universe 32bit max file size is 2gb (2147483648 Bytes)
Then the 64bit would be 4gb (2147483648*2 Bytes)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: 01 September 2004 11:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
Unix limitation? Perhaps something needs tweaking there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 September 2004 10:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Memo: Universe file size limit
Hi Everyone,
HPUX 11i running Univ
Hi Everyone,
HPUX 11i running Universe 9.6 - does anyone know if there is a 4GB file
limit?
We have 64 bit files on a 64 bit file system, but one of these files grew
to over 4gb and blew up with an Internal Data Error on a BASIC write. I
thought that 64 bit files were supposed to be vv large...
56 matches
Mail list logo
