You can change your view to "host" mode and login with the telnet client UniDebugger
users - some sort of stripped Dynamic Connect. You may have a connection script setup
that is incorrect.
Or is this when you are trying to read your source code? If you are on HP-UX then you
will need to use ei
Mark,
She meant me. To the best of my knowledge, Microdata never sold me to
anyone.
--
- Charles Barouch
(718) 762-3884 x 1 - Key Ally Voice Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Consulting services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - News
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - U2-Users Moderator
[EMAIL PROTE
Sorry that's not correct.
Comments have to be delimited just like everything else.
I did not say you can ignore what the tag says. I only said you can use "<"
and ">" to find the tag. If a tag starts with "!" then it requires special
processing.
Apologies Will,
I didn't mean to verbal you, just
In a message dated 9/15/2004 5:24:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So just working on fields will fail if there are any of these in the XML.
>
> So you cannot rely on < and > as delimiters.
Sorry that's not correct.
Comments have to be delimited just like everything els
Is Chuck "Results" Barouch related to the Results Application for Microdata.
I still have several clients on it and would love to get some documentation
and/or more clients. Those that have it, love it.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
.Net is a frame work, similar to the UniVerse Virtial Machine for UniBasic.
If I have a VB .Net application then I need the .Net Framework to run
underneath it. If I am using ASP.Net then it is only required on the web
server, not the web browser client.
As far as I am aware the .Net framework is
Is it not against the XML standard to have a quoted string containing
"<" or ">" in a tag?
You can certainly have comments like this in valid XML
And processing instructions
<> ?>
And CDATA Sections (I forget the format, but they can hold arbitrary
binary data).
So just working on fields will
Hi Nick,
If you are on UV I have found a combination of BYTEVAL and computed
GOSUBS to be the fastest way to process a string in BASIC character by
character.
Model your parser as a state machine and each state becomes
CC = BYTEVAL(XMLSTRING, POS)
POS += 1
ON CC + 2 GOSUB ENDOFSTRING,
Is it not against the XML standard to have a quoted string containing
"<" or ">" in a tag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Beahm
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Processing a st
You won't believe the panel we have assembled for a U2 User Group meeting
this coming Sunday in Las Vegas! OK, maybe it isn't the cast of Friends,
but a super panel none-the-less.
We will have:
Susie Siegesmund & Janet Oswald from IBM
and THE Tony Gravagno along with Chuck "Results" Barouch.
An
Permission on the source code.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Waldie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] UniDebugger won't let me in.
I can log in using wintegrate, and I can even telnet in, but an error
message is ret
Will-
Wouldn't that cause a problem if there are quoted strings containing
< or > characters? That's why I went character by character in my XML
routine. As someone else pointed out, handling truly large strings
efficiently usually comes down to not loading the entire thing into
memory at o
I can log in using wintegrate, and I can even telnet in, but an error
message is returned stating "invalid username or password" when I try to
access my source code using unidebugger.
Any suggestions on where to look first?
TIA
* Shawn Waldie
"I've got a subroutine that takes an XML string and tries to convert it
into a dynamic array. It does it byte by byte, and I'm just looking for
a faster way to parse the XML."
Nick, someone already alluded to this but you can probably make it faster by
extracting information FIELD by FIELD inste
1) How do I change my account to receive only the digest version daily
instead of
each of the messages?
Point your browser to http://listserver.u2ug.org to manage your
subscriptions
OR: send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT to the list) with
the following in the BODY of the email:
Unsubscribe
Nick, are you sure the bottleneck isn't the storage part of your subroutine?
Stuffing large amounts of data into a dynamic array can be slow.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
I bet this is killing the digest users. Only 13 more days. :-)
Bruce M Neylon
Health Care Management Group
"Ron Brunko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/15/2004 01:35 PM
Please respond to u2-users
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:[U2
How do I change my account to receive only the digest version daily instead of
each of the messages?
How do I keep mail from going into my mailbox while I am on vacation for 3
weeks?
Thanks,
Dave
Dave Taylor
President
Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
49 Aspen Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 9027
Then a different ACS probably.
I'm Thinking American Computer Sevices,
and chances are a differnt Nick..
George
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:09 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Processing a
I've got a subroutine that takes an XML string and tries to convert it
into a dynamic array. It does it byte by byte, and I'm just looking for
a faster way to parse the XML.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Note that this article appears on DEVELOPER library
In the past, albeit quite some time past, I was able to browse to an
ASPX page from a win95 machine without problems. I don't believe you
need the framework at all to browse to an ASPX page, it's all server
side and handled by IIS. Maybe this
And take a long time.
-Original Message-
From: Allen E. Elwood (CA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Alas .NET
I finally upgraded to w2000 and the speed is much better, and I don't
have
stupid problems with VPN
right , exactly what i just said - ASP.NET runs on a server which is
irrelevant as far as the client is concerned.
ASP.NET clients don't require anything other than an internet browser.
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednes
Last night, at a .NET meeting here in New Jersey, www.CrimsonEditor.com was
mentioned.
Crimson is worth considering.
--Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
I finally upgraded to w2000 and the speed is much better, and I don't have
stupid problems with VPN and I could go on and on about all the stuff that
works better, but that would be boring.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent:
Gerry:
This makes sense. Thanks for nailing it. If IBM does not comment on it
here, I expect to follow-up with them.
Regards,
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
I don't suppose that the type of problem being solved could be delved into a
bit more? There are a ton of string routines that I have found useful, but
they seem to be solutions waiting for a problem to solve, in this case.
j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Look at the XML parser subs on my site. I basically broke a document
variable down into an array by the ending and leading "<" ">" tags using
CONVERT. It makes no difference if the document variable is a single string
or an array of strings. You can also use this to parse plain ole HTML
documents
Probably, ACS has a presence in almost every major city in the country.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Proc
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotne
t/html/framewkwinsupp.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry
Sent: 15 September 2004 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Alas .NET
ASP.NET runs on the i
I am currently out of the office and cannot personally respond to your message. I will
be returning to the office on Tuesday, September 28th.
In my absense please contact Marc Mergenthaler at 303-504-5408 for any issues related
to HealthTrack; otherwise, please contact Al Armijo at 303-504-5359
ASP.NET runs on the internet server and has no bearing on the client.
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:58 am
Subject: RE: [U2] Alas .NET
> Unless you want to run ASP .NET of course.
>
> -O
this sounds like a confusion between development and client installations.
I have to assume that the developers guide is referring to software
requirements on development machines - which i suppose is IBM's client (?)
and their reply seems to support this.
there should be no uniobjects client requi
This series of UniData SQL commands gives me the result below.How can I
get the percent change calculations included in the report total?
EXECUTESQL 'CLEAR BREAK;'
EXECUTESQL 'CLEAR COMPUTE;'
EXECUTESQL 'BREAK ON grpType SKIP 1 ON REPORT SKIP 1;'
EXECUTESQL 'COMPUTE SUM
reference :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=262D25E3-F589-4842-8157-034D1E7CF3A3&displaylang=en
perhaps you are referring to VS.NET ?
- Original Message -
From: "gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:39 am
Sub
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately. Please note that there is no guarantee tha
Is using a sequential file out of the question? I just modified our
output browser to use sequential files, and it wasn't anywhere near as
hard as I had feared, and that had to support moving up and down through
the data. XML should be a one-way trip, making it downright simple.
This change m
Here's a thought: Break the code into lines and then parse each line
independently. The more you break it down into smaller pieces, the
faster the substring extraction will be because there'll be less
characters to scan.
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-Original Message
Beware the UniObjects.Net manual! You'll also find references and examples for
UniString objects that don't exist in the product.
Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit h
I thought that UV10 had support for XML?
I havn't used it, so I don't know how to go about it.
Also, you could always try sending it off to PERL routine
to parse, then give it back to UV.
George
PS. Nick, Are you from the Phila area? and is the ACS the
same ACS from Malvern?
>-Original Mes
DING DING DING! You win the prize for guessing the implementation!
Oh. No prize though. Only the satisfaction that you won. ;-)
Glenn
At 11:07 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
Using VAR = STR.VAR[X,1] is probably the fastest. If my suspicions are
correct, the C code to implement this function would sim
Maybe someday we will want to do ASP .NET...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Alas .NET
Unless you want to run ASP .NET of course.
-Orig
Using VAR = STR.VAR[X,1] is probably the fastest. If my suspicions are
correct, the C code to implement this function would simply use pointer math
to pull the character from memory -- which is pretty darn fast.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://lis
I found it in "UniObjects for .NET Developer's Guide", v6.1, June 2004,
Chapter 4, page 4-3, "Client Software Components".
SoftwareReqt
OS Win 2000 SP2 or Win XP Professional
Cutting and pasting an eMail from Leroy Dreyfuss...
Bill,
Unless you want to run ASP .NET of course.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry
Sent: 15 September 2004 15:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Alas .NET
huh ?
where did you get this nugget ?
.NET will run on w98 just peachy.
-
I'm trying to parse some very long XML code. If I do it byte by byte
this way, it is taking a very long time to parse. We are trying to find
a faster way to parse it.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matth
huh ?
where did you get this nugget ?
.NET will run on w98 just peachy.
- Original Message -
From: "Brutzman, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Hopp, Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 09:36 am
Subject: [U2] Alas .NET
> How bitter t
I've used that in the past for parsing strings that are several hundred
thousand chars in length but there's no significant difference until
then.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: 15 September 2004 14:22
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
How bitter that Microsoft requires Win2k or better on the client side.
I was hoping that Win98 would live for a few more years.
I wish that my facts were wrong...
--Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
You could fold the string into a dynamic array and use remove:
STR.VAR= "Some really really long string that has lots and lots of
characters for test processing."
FOLDED.VAR=FOLD(STR.VAR,1); *creates dynarray of single characters
LOOP
REMOVE ACHAR FROM FOLDED.VAR SETTING MARK
UNTIL NOT(MARK) and AC
Hi Nick,
In this case the "do stuff with VAR here" is very important
For example: If you want to change all VM to SVM in a long string then
STR.VAR = CHANGE(STR.VAR,VM,SVM) will be faster
It all depends on ...stuff...
Louie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Depends what you're trying to achieve I suppose. If it's for a checksum
then there are commands to do that. If it's looking for occurrences of
text then there are commands to do that as well.
If you have to step through a character at a time then that looks about
the best way of doing it to me.
-
What is the fastest way to process a long string byte by byte. I want
to know if there is a faster way to do the following:
STR.VAR = "Some really really long string that has lots and lots of
characters for test processing."
MAX.STR = LEN(STR.VAR)
FOR X = 1 TO MAX.STR
VAR = STR.V
We are using sockets on Universe 10 (aix 5.2)
Server side basic looks like this:
Specify Protocol Logging information
RESULT=protocolLogging("","ON",10)
SNDBUF = '' ; RCVBUF = ''
INADDR=""
INNAME=""
END.OF.TIME = ''
Specify server name and assign handles to
I am currently out of the office and cannot personally respond to your message. I will
be returning to the office on Tuesday, September 28th.
In my absense please contact Marc Mergenthaler at 303-504-5408 for any issues related
to HealthTrack; otherwise, please contact Al Armijo at 303-504-5359
I have used the socket API in UniVerse without encountering serious issues -
it's all raw stuff (accept/read/write). Also you cannot fork, so you're
limited to one listener per port, which may be an issue.
Unless you have a clear reason not to, interfacing with UniVerse or UniData
is really best d
56 matches
Mail list logo
