Eugene, how are ya!
Call Sam @ Advanced Transportation Systems. I think they're still running
UV. They used to be in the springs, but I think they moved to Palmer Lake. I
don't know exactly where he is right now, but I think he's still in CO.
719-598-4113
Glen
> -Original Message-
> F
Hello,
I have been kicking around the idea of a MV users group for Colorado. I have
spoken to some people while at the Spectrum show in Australia and got some
positive feedback. I have also been discussing it here in Denver and so far
the feedback has been good.
I am interested in knowing if th
CUPS - That reminds me.
We had an issue with CUPS default settings. We had a problem with the
default (500) amt of print jobs in the spooler. When we would generate tags
for the showroom (about 1400) the system would start dropping new jobs after
the 500 limit was reached. The other thing we not
Is there a built-in local program file in the uv account, one that isn't
overwritten with new code at upgrade? I have a vague recollection of such a
beastie... I'm wrapping the UNLOCK verb with a password & log output, and I
want to make sure that the changes survive upgrades.
"Our greatest du
Keep in mind that I'm not a certified Linux engineer. :P
The only file I/O problem I know of, with 2.4 kernels, is the buffering issue.
All kernel block devices are buffered by the kernel,
unless they are bound by a raw device binding. This could be the culprit in the
driver's bottleneck situa
Anthony Dzikiewicz wrote:
I would assume that you like Dell support ? My experience with them is
that they went from once upon a time very good (8 years ago or so) to
the pits. Every time I call, I get transferred overseas to India and
the conversation is almost unbearable. Recently, I ordered a
(Non-technical comments here can easily apply to U2 sites.)
As with all new procedures, I highly recommend that you do extensive
testing on the target system before running on live client data. Slam the
files that are being resized with different kinds of simultaneous updates
and see if the file
Here are some tweaks I made: (uv 9.6.14, rh7.0)
in /etc/rc.local:
# increase max files kernel parameter
echo 8192 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
in uvconfig:
# 11-19-02 asb: changed from default value of 12 to 36 re: spooler
over-write issue
# 01-28-05 asb: changed to 300 per Mat at IBM support.
MFILE
We have been live since October. Everything is fine at the Universe
level. We havent had any major issues at all.
One thing we used to do to get users off at the end of the night or when
needed is to do a 'MASTER OFF ALL'. It doesn't work on the Linux
version. Other than that, Universe is peach
I went from uv 9.4 on HPUX to 10.x.x on Red Hat AS3 in May of 2004. Had
no issues. Manually updated my uvconfig to match the one on the HP and
took a look at the newer uvconfig options. Linux kernel params were all
OK out of the box. I had to manually create my SB+ users because they
didn't want to
Yes, as of about version 6.
I didn't know it was possible in UniVerse. It's not in UniData :-(
Colin Alfke
Calgary, Canada
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Walter
>
>Wondering if anyone out there knows it it's ok, possible to
>resize open files in advanced pick running on AIX?
>
>In Univ
Jerry,
We moved off an HP K460 to RH on an IBM x-series box just over a year
ago. We average about 100 - 200+ users, depending on the time of year
(pre-registration is a heavy time!), and have had minimal problems with
it. Don't recall making any config changes. We're running a dual-proc
(2.
We are finally moving our UV off our Sun Solaris 8 System and moving to Redhat
on a Dell system. Many of you have been on Linux for awhile so tell me, how
was your conversion? Did you have to tweak any configuration parameters? Any
pitfalls we should know about? We usually run around 100 user sessi
The ones we use at our place are from American Micro Systems. We have
had one of them in a warehouse environment for about 6 years now and
it's still kicking. So, they are pretty rugged and reliable.
Anthony Dzikiewicz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re,
Yes it works,
Use RESIZE filename newmodulo (W
The W push a "wait state" between each frame processing. If not used; the
system give all priority to the resizing !
If a user-process perform a "sequential" access to the file; the resizing is
suspended.
Try it.
I hope this help.
Manu Fernandes
Wondering if anyone out there knows it it's ok, possible to resize open files in
advanced pick running on AIX?
In Universe, of course this is possible, but I'm not sure about AP on AIX.
I have a huge resizing project to pull off at a client that runs almost 24/7, so
it would be great to know that
In the past, we've used Symbol Synapse adapters to connect scanners to some
Wyse 150 & 160 terminals. Apart from night crews testing the cable strength
with box cutters, they've worked flawlessly.
-- John Solie -- Professional Hospital Supply -- 951-296-2600
> -Original Message-
> Fr
I actually have a wedge scanner that's been sitting unopened in the
box for some time. If anyone is interested let me know and I'll be
happy to let it go for real cheap.
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Another source: www.systemid.com
The wedge substitutes the data read by the scanner into keyboard
entry. But not all scanners will work with a wedge. Terminal wedges
are usually designed for specific manufacturers.
Or if you have old PCs that aren't in use right now, you can get another
typ
We're using a mixture of Unitec/Intermec here, but with PC's, not dumb
terms. I imagine they work much the same way, the scanner provides input
instead of the keyboard.
--
Dave Walker
8..7 4(()) -:&:-
-:&:-8.74 .74(())
((88.74 ..74 -:&:-
Anthony,
I've used Symbol Technologies scanners as wedge scanners. And you're
right, the database shouldn't matter.
- Chuck "Wedg-ee" Barouch
Anthony Caufield wrote:
I am curious as to what kind of wedge scanners people are using with
their dumb terminals. We have Wyse and Televideo termina
On our old SERIAL connected green screens we used a pen scanner that had a
box that hooked up on the serial connection. American Microsystems (817)
571-9015 a M1000 series decoder box. If I remember there was some
programmable options.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Caufield [SMTP:[
I'm always appalled at what seems to be the general consensus around
here that a GUI interface and fast, efficient, effective data entry are
mutually exclusive.
Colin "what the HE - double-hockey sticks is going on here" Alfke
Calgary, Canada
>-Original Message-
>From: Don Kibbey
>
>If y
I am curious as to what kind of wedge scanners people are using with
their dumb terminals. We have Wyse and Televideo terminals and we have
been asked to hook up scanners. I know I did this several years ago but
I cant remember what it was we used. So any input would be helpful. I
don't know if it
If you use some care in design and layout of your windows screens, you can
make them just as effective as "green screen" apps. Make sure you've set
your tab order to a logical sequence, setup and use shortcut key
combinations that make sense and use something like the down arrow to
activate pick li
What is the maximum size a numeric value can be in Unidata ?
>From my testing
0002 A = 99
0003 B = A + 1
0004 PRINT B
Gives
100
While
0002 A = 999
0003 B = A + 1
0004 PRINT B
1611392
Anyone know what the "supported"
Jeff,
Well said. I have been saying the same thing for years.
Executives demand point-and-click, which is a great interface for some
applications, but not rapid data entry. Perhaps it is telling more about
their abilities then they would like to reveal. Oh well, they purchase the
software.
I
>From what we have experienced here, the addition of .NET applications on
top of Unidata that replace existing green screen functions is not a
benefit. Depending on how they are written.
The users who have been using they older green screens, want them back.
Clicking around .NET screens is not m
+AD4- In your experience, would '+ACE-kill -15 +AFs-pid+AF0-' cause any Unidata
problems like
+AD4- file corruption, etc?
+AD4- It could indeed cause file corruption if the pid was in the middle of a
WRITE.
Why aren't you going a +ACI-deleteuser pid+ACI- .. doesn't UDT on SUN have that?
---
Thanks for the information, Anthony.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Corrente [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 29, 2005 7:38 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject:Re: [U2] +AFs-UD+AF0- Halting a Unidata process
Hi Tom,
Using kill -TERM [udtpid] (as you sugges
> We are running UD 5.2.32 on Sun 5.9. Sometimes a '!kill [pid]' doesn't
> halt a Unidata process.
>
> In your experience, would '!kill -15 [pid]' cause any Unidata problems like
> file corruption, etc?
It could indeed cause file corruption if the pid was in the middle of a WRITE.
Regardless, th
Hi Tom,
Using kill -TERM [udtpid] (as you suggest), should not corrupt files.
Infact kill -TERM is what the stopudt script (NOT stopud!!!) does.
:!cat $UDTBIN/stopudt
#! /bin/sh
#
# This script is to be used on Unix platforms.
#
# stopudt: Stops one or more udt or mach processes cleanly,
# by p
Im looking at my last post and it looks garbled.
It should read;
Rpm -qa | grep libc
And the rest is what was returned not what I was grepping for.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz
Sent: Friday, April 29,
Hi,
We are running UD 5.2.32 on Sun 5.9. Sometimes a '+ACE-kill +AFs-pid+AF0-'
doesn't halt
a Unidata process.
In your experience, would '+ACE-kill -15 +AFs-pid+AF0-' cause any Unidata
problems like
file corruption, etc?
Thanks.
Tom Cordes, CFM project
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@
I didnt realize that the libc ver was in the kernel numbering/naming
scheme. So, on my system (RedHat EL AS), I did the following;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] anthony]$ rpm -qa | grep libc
glibc-common-2.3.2-95.27
glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.27
glibc-2.3.2-95.27
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.34.1
glibc-utils-2.3.2-9
I guess it is this one you are looking at?
10.1.4 RHEL V3 (2.4.21-4g, 2.3.2-95.20g) and greater
9 (2.4.20-28.9g, 2.3.2-27.9.7g) and greater
it clearly say that the supported kernel should be 2.4.21-4g or greater so your
kernel-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL should be ok to run 10.1.4 on!
the number after
36 matches
Mail list logo
