Particular? Peculiar might be a better word.
Was this instructor trained in Computer Science or General Semantics.
:-)
--
Regards,
Clif
On Jun 6, 2005, at 6:22 PM, Bill Haskett wrote:
However, with "EQUATE VM TO CHAR(254)" there is no such relationship,
so I
was taught not to do this a
Wendy,
If you log off and log back on, it should be changed.
Eugene
> I'm trying to modify a globally cataloged subroutine I'm using as a
> trigger, and the changes don't seem to "take" for a while.
>
> The docs say "Periodically, sbcs checks shared memory and removes loaded
> programs that are
Clif and David:
Don't let the Raining Data price fool you. Mv.NET will offer the same thing
for a ___LOT___ less! I'm testing out SQL Reporting services using ODBC and
it works nicely. At this point it's free. I'm going to be testing it with
OleDB shortly. Still, at this point it's free or, a
Mark,
What are these timing tests?
They kinda look like the tool PI has. I can almost remember the name of
it now, but it was so long ago.
Is this a tool we users can run or is this something internal at IBM?
If internal, do you have a complete set of comparative speeds for the
various operations
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:58:28 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>I've got a naive Unidata question, but figured I'd throw it out there
>anyway. In short, does indexing a field in a given file help performance
>when querying for an empty string? ie:
>
>SELECT MY_TABLE WITH MY_FIELD=''
>
>I've always assumed
Charlie:
It's funny you should raise Microdata. I was taught to never use EQUATEs
unless I wanted to create a relationship between both sides of the equation.
e.g I'd use the following:
EQUATE APFILE$CUSTDATE TO APFILEREC(1)
This would allow me to manipulate either side of the equate and know b
I've got a naive Unidata question, but figured I'd throw it out there
anyway. In short, does indexing a field in a given file help performance
when querying for an empty string? ie:
SELECT MY_TABLE WITH MY_FIELD=''
I've always assumed yes but would like to hear other's thoughts.
Jeff Butera,
I'm obviously biased, but they could do worse than look at our Visage.Reporter
product. Comes in 2 varieties for report production - 'free' production with
Visage [web] clients, client preview etc, or server based version for direct
output to any server accessible printer, options for fax, email
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> I'm trying to modify a globally cataloged subroutine I'm
using as a
> trigger, and the changes don't seem to "take" for a while.
>
> The docs say "Periodically, sbcs checks shared memory and
> removes loaded programs that are no longer in use."
>
> How long is "periodically"?
Do the programs use a CLEAR statement?
Is Error.Msg in a COMMON statement?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:18 PM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] External SubRoutine Problem
Clifton Oliver wco-at-oliver.com |U2UG| wrote:
> One of my clients has asked me what reporting tools,
> other than Crystal Reports other U2 shops favor.
> Any recommendations of what they might want to evaluate?
The answer sort of depends on how much of a canned solution they want vs
how OK they a
False alarm... I found a pesky typo.
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:18 PM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] External SubRoutine Problems
Using UniVerse, UniBasic, I am tr
I'm trying to modify a globally cataloged subroutine I'm using as a
trigger, and the changes don't seem to "take" for a while.
The docs say "Periodically, sbcs checks shared memory and removes loaded
programs that are no longer in use."
How long is "periodically"? Likely I wouldn't want to cha
Using UniVerse, UniBasic, I am trying to...
call *SUB.BIN.TO.BIN.R0 (Part.Nbr, Qty.Pieces, Source.Bin, Target.Bin,
Error.Msg )
(give, give, give, give, get
)
begin case
case Error.Msg # '' ; gosub Error.Handler
end case
This
Microsoft SQL Reporting Services is a good product and I think it is
Rainingdata that is providing an interface between MV and SQL Reporting
Services.
Regards
David Jordan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Tuesday, 7 Jun
We use Mvquery. Mvquery does a nice job with ad-hoc reports. It does
have it's limitations.
Clifton Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of my clients has asked me what reporting tools, other than Crystal
Reports other U2 shops favor.
Any recommendations of what they might want to evaluate?
Th
One of my clients has asked me what reporting tools, other than Crystal
Reports other U2 shops favor.
Any recommendations of what they might want to evaluate?
Thanks in Advance.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES
Steve,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Steven M Wagner
> Sent: Sunday, 5 June 2005 14:40
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Source code question
>
> The answer is a big fat maybe. It will depend on how
> differ
We had a very similar problem except on Crystal 9. Loaded all the
patches (2?) from Crystal's web site and now "appears" to be working.
We are now in process of testing on X and XI.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moderator
Sent: Mon
POSTED ON BEHALF OF NON-MEMBER ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi all,
New to the list; I've browsed the archives but cannot find anything
relating to specifically the problem I am having, so if anyone can
offer assistance it would be much appreciated.
Crystal Reports XI trying to access Universe 10.1.7
In his June 28th, 2005 PCMagazine column, John Dvorak references how
Longhorn was going to try to do what Pick OS did 30 years ago - make the
file system a database...
Sort of 'Industry' relevant - and it's mainstream press, and - whooo hooo -
not negative! Just that Microsoft couldn't pull it o
>I'd also wonder about port-specific usage. I believe I
> worked on a Unix
> box a while back where they mapped the ports so that every
> time a person logged
> in they got the same port number. Don't ask me exactly how
> they did this.
HP-UX has a facility called DDFA. It is meant to be use
>Someone already mentioned the issue of TIME() which also
> impacts things
> like SLEEP and RQM and NAP.
This is tuneable in the UniVerse config. As long as you stick to working in
whole seconds - which always used to be the default - this should be fine.
>I'd also wonder about port-spe
23 matches
Mail list logo
