I have a project that was built with UO.NET v2.1.0.7149.
I have an end-user with UO.NET v2.1.1.7211.
The UniSDK does not automatically register the UODOTNET.DLL assembly into
the GAC. I manually registered it with gacutil but the main project still
does not find it - which leads me to ask:
Are t
My issue is with sessions that a not closing out properly. Maybe users
"X"ing out rather than doing a LO and also with records locked. We
don't use Phantoms that much and we're not using UO or ODBC. A pretty
straight Green Screen apps with everyone using terminal emulation and
Telnet to get ther
Jeff:
This thread is about __MORE__ than just the data! Kevin eloquently pointed
out that some of the "old ways" in the U2 space need to be abandoned for
more modern thinking. A certain perspective has survived here for years and
this has spilled over into a number of areas where the U2 products
Thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dallaire
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 11:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: [uv] 10.2
We are running UV 10.2 in house with SB+ and SB Client 5.3.4.
We hav
I have to agree with this. One of the things that Raining Data have done
right (IMHO) is to provide case insensitivity, right down to the file
level ... if you want SMITH = smith you can, if SMITH # smith you can
set a file up for that as well
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage > Better by Design
While I remember - there *was* a problem with IP addresses being reversed
for some client connections - this caused (as you noted) the device
licensing pool to be incorrectly distributed between mixed session types
(telnet vs ODBC vs UO etc) - each having an unique and separate pool. So one
client
SEARCH was designed to be fast and, at the time, it was much faster
to scan for the first character of the searched-for string and, if
you found it, execute a string compare instruction. It was also a
much simpler algorithm. I later wrote a case-insensitive version but
it either never made it i
Brian
Any PHANTOM that opens a Socket is a license consumer - it's not a bug, it
was intentional (see iPHANTOMS).
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: 14 March 2007 23:08
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subje
I am curious, are the bugs in the PICK flavour, but not in the ideal
flavour.
Regards
David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
We're running it on a test & dev server and so far are fine - nothing to
report. OS is Win2003 server. I'm also curious to read anything about
this before we go live.
Laure Hansen,
City of Redwood City
Information Technology
www.redwoodcity.org
1017 Middlefield Road
Redwood City, CA 94063
Tel: 650
We are running UV 10.2 in house with SB+ and SB Client 5.3.4.
We have found 3 issues thus far and IBM is working on all of them at this
time.
1. When exiting out of an SBClient session by clicking on the "X" in the
upper right corner the session will close, but the UniVerse Port is left
"logged i
Speaking of UV 10.2 - anyone running it care to share their experience.
I've heard rumors of a "locking" issue, but don't know the details.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- Subject: Re:
[U2] Upper Case Only
I missed the start of this thread so appologi
True... but there is no hypocrisy in the "Clap On... Clap Off...The
Clapper".
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Reports In Universe BASIC
So Simple, yet effective.
Regards,
--
Donald Verhagen
Application Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc.
5901 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 450
Boca Raton, FL 33487 USA
Voice Phone: 561.226.8261 Fax Phone: 561.226.8115
>>> On 3/15/2007 at 10:52 am, in message
I missed the start of this thread so appologies if this has been said
before
UV 10.2 introduces a CASE command to turn on / off case sensitivity.
Unfortunately, as far as I can see, they don't appear to have documented it
(along with quite a lot of other new stuff).
Having tried it earli
Diane,
Dictionaries to change case are great if you are searching on a
specific field. I think Laura's issue relates to searching the entire
text of a record.
- Chuck "Putting Words In Laura's Mouth Even Though She Can Speak
For Herself Since 2004" Barouch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn
Thanks Diane. It is a data issue... but also a programming challenge as
well. It sounds like your environment has had standards in place that make
it easy to live in the "Upper/lower case world", but this isn't the case
with many applications, nor with a lot of legacy software and/or data. And
it's
I don't have a problem with PRINT ON, I simply think that if you're
printing to the printer, at least say PRINTER ON so it's obvious.
We need the hippocratic oath for this industry.
http://www.hal-pc.org/~ollie/hippocratic.oath.html
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
** Check
Different subject all together. I don't think anyone would disagree that
there is a need to store (some) data in upper/lower case. The ongoing
discussion has been about program source code, the 'consumer' of which
is the machine itself who really doesn't give a hoot one way or another.
Oh, and
Thanks its the last formula that I was actually failing to visualise. I thought
it would involve some complicated algorithm.
Thanks, Marco.
- Original Message
From: Perry Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, 16 March, 2007 1:31:10 PM
Subject: RE: [U
Isn't that really more of a data issue though, rather than a programming issue?
I absolutely believe that data should be stored in U/L case, but that doesn't
affect the programming at all. For searching on this data, we just use
dictionaries that put it in all upper case - very easy to search on.
I think that the upper/lower case issue -- albeit not a show stopper for
anyone - is "much worse than that".
Besides the "internal" back-n-forth about programming in basic, and what
case should be "current", I think that a bigger issue revolves around data
presentation and converting to a "modern"
The 'extra' time when calling as a function is likely due to
the assignment of the result to a variable. Doing that
a million times has to trigger a significant number of
garbage collects.
Perhaps You could modify the test to call the routine
and 'copy' the result argument to a variable -
it shou
Marco,
BEG.TIMEDATE = TIMEDATE()
END.TIMEDATE = TIMEDATE()
BEG.TIME = ICONV(FIELD(BEG.TIMEDATE, ' ', 1, 1), 'MT')
BEG.DATE = ICONV(FIELD(BEG.TIMEDATE, ' ', 2, 3), 'D')
END.TIME = ICONV(FIELD(END.TIMEDATE, ' ', 1, 1), 'MT')
END.DATE = ICONV(FIELD(END.TIMEDATE, ' ', 2, 3), 'D')
ET = END.TIME - BE
re,
a little expression
* 11:31:41 16 Mar 2007timedate() sample
* A = TIMEDATE() 1
* B = TIMEDATE() 2
*-
BD = (ICONV(OCONV(A,'G1 3'),'D') * 86400)
ED = (ICONV(OCONV(B,'G1 3'),'D') * 86400)
BT = ICONV(OCONV(A,'G0:3'),'MTS')
ET = ICONV(OCONV(B,'G0:3'),'MTS')
DIFF = (ED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:25 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Difference between two TIMEDATES in seconds
Hello everyone,
Can someone help me with this. I need a way to
Hello everyone,
Can someone help me with this. I need a way to calculate the difference between
two TIMEDATE() and return the results in seconds. The biggest difference I
expect between the two time dates is 100 days.
Thanks and regards, Marco.
___
One reason for why the upper case only thing started that has been mentioned
in this thread is that some early terminals didn't have lower case.
This is indeed true but it used to be much worse than that !
The early days computers themselves didn't handle lowercase as they had
6bit characters a
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin King
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
From: MAJ Programming
Like helping the newbies with MV, I can now add this
little tidbit to my mental library of techniques
should the need arise.
Just because one can doesn't mean one should. In the case of PRINT ON
workin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, MAJ
Programming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I will stand on my soapbox and shout that MV has no standards, just a lot of
styles. There is no governing body to enforce standards and if the remaining
providers (u2/uv/ d3 etc) were to build and force them, there would
31 matches
Mail list logo
