[U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Burwell, Ed
Has anyone developed or know of a way to do the equivalent of a UNION query in UniData? I have 2 files, one is a daily file and the other is a monthly file. At night the daily records get moved into the monthly file and the daily file gets cleared. At month-end, the monthly data gets moved

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Baakkonen, Rodney A (Rod) 46K
MERGE.LIST has a UNION option. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Burwell, Ed Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:09 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UD] Union Query Has anyone developed or know of a way to do the equivalent of a

[U2] OVER QUOTING

2007-05-16 Thread Moderator
All, Please strip down unneeded parts of the quoted message. Some people have size limits on email, some has slow connections, some use the digest, some search the archives, and none of those people benefit from over quoting. - Charles Barouch, Moderator U2-Users, U2-Community,

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Charles Barouch
Ed, When I face this, I build a little BASIC program which builds a UNION file which is keyed by file * item and then I do the Query against that file. You could probably build the UNION file from triggers and always keep it current. Here's how it works: If DAILY.FILE has three

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Norman Morgan
I'm with you, Charles. We face this all the time, since Prelude's ADS splits data into open and history files. Merging lists is all well and good, but I still have to retrieve data from two separate files. I always wind up writing Basic to do it, making independent selects from each file and

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread David A. Green
Has anyone developed or know of a way to do the equivalent of a UNION query in UniData? I have 2 files, one is a daily file and the other is a monthly file. At night the daily records get moved into the monthly file and the daily file gets cleared. At month-end, the monthly data gets moved into

[U2] Running UniData on SAN

2007-05-16 Thread bradley . schrag
A few months ago someone mentioned that a paper was forthcoming from IBM re recommendations on running UniData on a SAN. Does anyone know the status of this paper? I don't see anything out there yet. tia Brad --

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread john reid
Not sure if sql is an option for you... but there is a union construct in it. Both files have a '1' id. The ids are not shown in second example. j SELECT @ID,DT FROM DAILY UNION SELECT @ID,DT FROM MONTHLY; DAILY.DT1... 1 12-30-2001 1 08-12-2010 2

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread David Wolverton
Question for everyone then: Should IBM invent a method to extend the Query languages of UniData/UniVerse to do this 'Temporal File' - a Cross Data File SELECT/LIST/SORT? That is, should the logic for handling multiple datafiles with a common dictionary basis be 'native' to the processes? Would

RE:[U2] A couple of questions about the PE version

2007-05-16 Thread Dave Taylor
Keith, I addition to the Universe database, you should have also downloaded the associated Clients pkg. This includes UniAdmin for administering Universe as well as Dynamic Connect, a telnet client used to connect with Universe with any one of a number of terminal emulations. You can install

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Burwell, Ed
Amen David. My only interest in this is to do SORTs and LISTs. I haven't even thought about the SELECT and READNEXT thing. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:26 PM To:

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Charles Barouch
David, I'd vote for that! Here's the language I'd suggest: SORT, LIST, SELECT, SSELECT (at minimum) should allow for data in multiple data levels as an option. The keyword SPANNING would be used to indicate which data levels or SPANNING ALL for all data levels. When Spanning is used,

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Victor St Clair
Hello I was at a U2 Convention in Anaheim a few years ago, the first year U2 was part of the IBM. I had an opportunity to speak to a couple U2 engineers, sorry I've forgotten now who they were. I asked them if they'd ever considered implementing this. Their reaction was pretty much Why would

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Jeff Schasny
I vote no. The UV/UD query language is fundamentally designed to work against one file with correlatives/I-types pointing to any other tables from which we require related data. This is something at the core of our environment. The problem here is, shall we say, problematic database design.

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread David Wolverton
I see you started the ball rolling on this... Does this also need to go to U2AskUs? That is, how much influence does BnB have on product direction? Or does IBM need to hear this request directly from multiple VARs? (Which we could probably coordinate in a day!) DW -Original Message-

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Don Verhagen
I'd have to second David on this. I wish in Unibasic there was a program/function to create temporary user files that get cleaned-up on exit and let UD/UV determine the area to create these on the file system. Donald Verhagen Never clean my room when I was younger either -- Donald Verhagen

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Bill Haskett
Chuck: Does UV have multi-level files? I thought it was restricted to UD and even UD documentation doesn't recommend the structure because it's too Pick-like. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread David Wolverton
We know that's the CURRENT fundamental design... We're talking an extension to that design for those who would find it useful. I never use many parts of UniData - should those be removed because I don't see the need? g The issue is that UniData (where we all are) does NOT have a PartFile. If we

RE: [U2] Running UniData on SAN

2007-05-16 Thread David Wolverton
We have one customer very happy with their LeftHand Networks SAN, and another about to install one. I think IBM is squeamish with the competition for bandwidth - at the IOD last year, they in particular said that Exchange places such a heavy demand on the disk subsystem, that it should not be

[U2] Unidata and form generation.

2007-05-16 Thread Terry Stennette
Hello All, Does anyone have any information or experience with software written for Unidata, in this case on windows 2003, that does form generation for formatted reporting? Say for example payroll checks, w2's, ap checks, etc. If so I'd like to check it out. Thanks, Terry --- u2-users

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Jeff Schasny
Which we were you speaking of? Just kidding, seemed like such a great sentence I could not resist. Anyway, since it already exists in Universe my guess would be that implementing multi part files would be easier, and less kludgey, than implementing some sort of file spanning, temp file

Re: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Charles Barouch
Bill, Sure does. CREATE.FILE ML CREATE.FILE DATA ML,TOO You end up with one DICT and two DATA levels. - Chuck Just Retested It Barouch Bill Haskett wrote: Does UV have multi-level files? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit

RE: [U2] Unidata and form generation. [not-secure]

2007-05-16 Thread Hennessey, Mark F.
We use PlanetPress Suite from Objectif Lune - http://www.objectiflune.com It is great software - I spool data to it as if it were a printer. A process identifies what form the data should be merged into, where it should be printed, if a PDF should be created, etc. In our shop we print letters

RE: [U2] [UD] Union Query

2007-05-16 Thread Tom Dodds
Does anyone know how this is handled and what the syntax is in other database reporting tools? That might be a good start for an implementation on U2. I for one do not know. Tom Dodds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny Sent:

[U2] [UV] Nice SET.INDEX enhancement

2007-05-16 Thread Jeff Fitzgerald
Hi all, IBM tech support just made me aware of an apparently undocumented feature that was added to SET.INDEX in release 10.1 allowing a relative path for the index file. SET.INDEX filename TO RELATIVE.PATH This command will set the index pathname to ./I_filename eliminating

RE: [U2] Unidata and form generation.

2007-05-16 Thread Larry Hiscock
Check out UnForm from Synergetic Data Systems (http://www.sdsi.com). It's a great product with great support. I've implemented it in a UniData on Unix environment. It uses an external rule file to mark up the page, so you don't need to make any changes to your programs. The latest version

[U2] [UV] Every UV Shop needs to read Jeff's note on: Nice SET.INDEX enhancement

2007-05-16 Thread Stephen O'Neal
The COPYing of files and the failure to perform the set SET.INDEX command after the copy, has caused numerous system failures. (One site failed just last week.) Jeff Fitzgerald's excellent e-mail is a must be read by all UV shops. You may wish to consider changing every index you have on your