Could you post the LIST.INDEX results for this?
If only one field is affected, there might be something specific about that.
Regards
Brian
On 15 April 2013 at 03:20 david yu d...@yahoo.com wrote:
hello Tom,
I wish I could just ignore it but as I previously mentioned, our patient are
not
Hi Manu.
I have had the same errors on some boxes with 10.2.10 UV version.
The only reference I've found is this entry in 10.2.10 PATCHLIST:
8588 Under certain circumstances, the UniVerse login process on Windows
may result in the user id incorrectly being set to -2. At the
current release,
Hi.
Have you upgraded O.S. version and/or UV version recently?
Regards
--
Augusto
2013/4/15 br...@brianleach.co.uk br...@brianleach.co.uk
Could you post the LIST.INDEX results for this?
If only one field is affected, there might be something specific about
that.
Regards
Brian
On 15
We did not have any OS or Universe upgrade.
here is the list.index
LIST.INDEX CALL.FILE ALL
Alternate Key Index Summary for file CALL.FILE
File... CALL.FILE
Indices 4 (2 A-type, 1 C-type, 1 D-type, 0 I-type, 0 SQL, 0 S-type)
Index Updates.. Enabled, No updates pending
Index
Not to say this has anything to do with it, but it sounds like this is a
big file. Does CALL.STATUS just have a few valid values? And when you're
running this report are you selecting a lot of values for one value of
CALL.STATUS?
It shouldn't mess up, but indexing used to be iffy if you
