Jeff
By 'large dictionary' do you mean that the dictionary itself is too large -
has lots of synonyms - or that the data it is describing has that number of
fields and so has become too large for efficient storage?
If the former, I've found people often forget to resize their dictionaries
and
Thanks to those who replied.
1) we have tools to easily edit dictionaries of any size (one of the few
benefits of Datatel/ Ellucian)
2) we have tools to monitor and resize dictionaries just like any other file (
also a Datatel benefit)
It's more of a general question about performance. We
If I LIST a Type 30 file,
Then execute a ls -la FILENAME it shows the last time DATA.30 portion was
modified was when I did the LIST.
Why would a LIST modify the date/time stamp that a file was modified? The
OVER.30 wasn't changed at this point.
George
Jerry,
As previous posts have pointed out a Dictionary is no different than any other
file. It need to be properly sized for the data it holds. When properly
sized will have maximum performance by definition. No need to 'split'
files
At TCL: 'file.stat DICT filename'
If I remember correctly, Universe always opens files for update, regardless
if you actually write to the file or not. This will cause the modified time
on the file to be changed.
*Aaron Titus*
Senior Software Engineer
F.W. Davison Company, Inc.
508-747-7261 x245
ati...@fwdco.com
On Wed, Aug
What is odd, is that If I LIST a Type 19/1 file, the time stamp doesn't get
changed.
George
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Titus
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:42 AM
To: U2 Users List
hi,
When uv open a T30, it's header is loaded into uv's shared memory (until all
user session which adress the file terminate), ready for writing.
File is open for writing, I suppose some header info are updated at open time.
Manu
George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com a écrit :
If I LIST
Type 19/1 files are actually directories at the operating system, not
files.
*Aaron Titus*
Senior Software Engineer
F.W. Davison Company, Inc.
508-747-7261 x245
ati...@fwdco.com
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Manu Fernandes e...@infodata.lu wrote:
hi,
When uv open a T30, it's header is
I figured that was the case for 1/19's, but still, it really messes things up
when your trying
To quickly decide which files have been changed recently.
George
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Aaron
Provided your dictionaries, in the one file scenario, or the five file
scenario, are each and all, properly sized THEN
You are more efficient in reading all dict entries from a single dict file
BECAUSE
Your app is only handling a single file pointer AND
Your internal
I am looking for a Customer Relationship Management application.
I have a client who is familiar with Universe and would prefer that, but
willing to look at other MV database applications.
However they also will want to demo this to their own clients from time-to-time
and so want a pretty
Hi:
I have a 100% Web based CRM package that runs on Universe or Unidata. I
would be happy at anytime to give you a demo of its capabilities or check
out our web site for more information.
Regards,
Doug
www.u2logic.com
Full Suite of applications for U2
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Wjhonson
You're quite clear that you don't want a pitch for non-MV so that's
not where I'm going here. I think this inquiry is fascinating for how
it's presented rather than what it's about. In short, in this case I
think you're doing MV a dis-service by being so supportive. Because my
response isn't
Always appreciate your insights Tony, thank you.
Danny Ruckel
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:50 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re:
The reason U2 is such a small player in the database market is, in my
opinion, we are a VAR driven market. The VAR's can only sell so much. The
software quality of the applications is dependent on the VAR. And don't
get me start on telnet applications. If Rocket Software U2 sold
applications,
We export to flat files (tearing apart the multivalue bonds) and import into
Microsoft Dynamics (via a C# routine) on a nightly basis.
So far it works fairly well - especially for collating all the different
sources we have customers in (multiple files - multiple product types).
Whereas, our MV
Boy, I'm starting to feel inadequate - I've no blog to offer!
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:18 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] I am looking for
What do you do about data change conflicts between these two disconnected
systems?
-Original Message-
From: George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 2:21 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] I am looking for a CRM package on
The nightly export scans the files each night and detects any changes or
additions.
We are working on removals - as these are harder to detect
What I did was create a set of files on the UV side that mimick the flat files.
Essentially, we take each set of data - figure out how it would look as
Why about in the other direction?
Or is that strictly ad hoc ?
-Original Message-
From: George Gallen ggal...@wyanokegroup.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 2:30 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] I am looking for a CRM package on multi-value
The
For anything that would need to come back, we pull using SQL
But, we are using a business rule that any changes must be made at the source
(MV)
Which would then percolate back to the CRM that night.
We aren't using the CRM to update the MV - only the MV to update the CRM
As well, we have non
Does anyone see any issues with removing Q pointers to files that won't open?
0001 *
0002 * Find Q-pointers that point to nothing, and delete them
0003 *
0004 EQUATE FALSE TO 0, TRUE TO 1
0005 OPEN 'VOC' TO F.VOC ELSE
0006 DISPLAY 'Cannot open VOC file.' ; STOP
0007 END
If you were worried then you could write the suspect ones off to a log file
before you deleted them.
Then you could see what the were afterwards if needed?
Perhaps also for some reason you might have q-pointer off to another account
that may not exist right now but that will be used down the
23 matches
Mail list logo
