Last time I checked, the official stance from what was then IBM is that
virtual environments other than VMWare were not supported, and even
then, any DB issues that you ran into while running under VMWare would
need to be fully replicated in a physical environment before support
would be provided.
This may be a total red herring, but I would try setting both subroutine
arguments to something, not just the first one - even if you only set
them to String.Empty. How is the subroutine catalogued BTW?
As for your connection pooling issue - Make sure you are:
1. using a UniObjects DLL that
Sounds to me like you need NFA (Network File Access).. Unfortunately its
licensed separately so may not be included in your current licenses..
Check out the manual:
http://www.rocketsoftware.com/u2/epubs/pdf/29921060.pdf
Regards
Ray
-Original Message-
From:
Hello all,
We have recently installed UniData 7.2 on a 64bit Windows 2008 Server
and are running into a problem when trying to connect UniObjects to a
local UniData database using local addresses such as 127.0.0.1 /
localhost / machine name...
UniObjects is failing with the following
I have written code to run in both UniData and UniVerse for tracking
audit information within triggers.. In order to maintain a decent
performance level by avoiding repetitive and expensive file opens, we
use either a set of known named common variables for specific files, or
we have a generic
I have had some success with using XML SOAP with custom namespaces.. I
never had any problems extracting the XML data however, my issues were
all centred around needing to send SOAP requests with a specific xmlns
attribute in the elements, and there was no way of specifying the xmlns
values to
Does anyone have any experience using Sequentially hashed files? The
documentation on Sequentially hashed files is not very explicit about
what kinds of benefits or problems can be expected / experienced.. It
also only hints towards one use case, but IMO doesn't do enough to
clearly define when
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: 20 October 2009 16:46
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Sequentially Hashed Files
In message
5e5ef002669716488cf5f69288ba6b093bf...@msgl-lon01-es01.msgluk.local,
Raymond P. de Bourbon rdebour...@msgl.com writes
Does anyone have
You may want to dig through the archives for this mailing list - there
were some interesting posts at the end of February under a topic
Inter-process Control that could be of use to you..
Ray
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
Whenever we have run into this kind of error (RPC error 81009) using
UniObjects.NET we have pretty much always been able to trace it back to
a single UDT/UV process that is taking excessively long, or requiring
excessive disk/memory IO in order to complete..
The common one we initially ran into
Something that we implemented for our Data Access Layer to improve
performance with UniObjects.NET was a custom connection pool (before IBM
released connection pooling in UniObjects.NET) and in that connection
pool, all the idle connections were kept active for a specified time,
and had a
In my experience its best to use non-blocking sockets..
It's can be a bit of a pain depending on the situation, but with some
careful wait until x unless received y bytes type loops you can cater
for pretty much any scenario.. In the scenarios where I have control
over both sides of the
12 matches
Mail list logo