RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

2004-08-02 Thread George Gallen
-Original Message- From: Nick Cipollina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem We are having a problem with our phantom processes. We have a job that runs as a phantom that spawns many phantom processes. When

RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

2004-08-02 Thread Nick Cipollina
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem if the phantom is still running, I've found that any phantoms spawned by that phantom will not fully die until

Re: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

2004-08-02 Thread Stu Glancy
, it emails me a message and stops. No defunct processes. - Original Message - From: Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:26 PM Subject: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem We are having a problem with our phantom processes. We have a job that runs

RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

2004-08-01 Thread John Jenkins
Nick I assume these *are* true PHANTOMs and not background jobs spawned from cron or at? Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: 31 July 2004 20:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem

2004-08-01 Thread Nick Cipollina
Yes they are true phantoms. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 6:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Phantom Problem Nick I assume these *are* true PHANTOMs