Doug,
If your solution is 100% web-based, are you doing scanning on the web
client? If so, how do you accomplish that?
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Doug Averch wrote:
[ad]
We wrote a document management system about 5 years ago. We sell it with
our CRM system as a way to store documents, images,
Hi Bob:
Most documents you receive today are from emails, XML, CSV, Excel, Word, or
even X-rays. Even if you receive a paper document almost every office has a
copier and scanner were the documents are deposited on a network drive.
They are already digital so you can find them on the network or
Tony,
Drop me an email - we have a system in Visage that might fit the bill.
Actually we have done a few different varieties around the same theme, and have
integrated aspects of this across our R5 ERP system, so people can store an
original faxed order and a scanned copy of signed invoice for
: Sunday, July 24, 2011 6:39 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Document Management
Tony,
Drop me an email - we have a system in Visage that might fit the bill.
Actually we have done a few different varieties around the same theme, and
have integrated aspects of this across our R5 ERP system, so
[ad]
We wrote a document management system about 5 years ago. We sell it with
our CRM system as a way to store documents, images, contracts and emails.
The document management system, however, can be sold stand alone as well.
It is 100% Web based and can run on Universe or Unidata. One of our
Check out 1mage
http://www.1mage.com/
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tony Gravagno 3xk547...@sneakemail.com wrote:
It looks like your responses, including mine here, are unanimous
- it's preferred to store blobs outside the DB and metadata
inside. I see no benefits to storing blobs in the
Hello U2-ers,
Has anyone checked out the CoStar product from KeyNet, Inc?
http://www.keynetinc.com/
Sorry, I'm a little late into this thread - but, from what I've been
reading in the thread, sounds like you should all be checking out this
company and product. They've been doing this for a
Does it make any sense to use a U2 database to save scanned pdf's? That is...
Does it make any sense to save small blobs in a U2 data base?
Would a Type 1 file be best?
Are there any advantages to using MS-SQL, MySQL, or some other database
technology?
--Bill
the actual
pdf data.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:10 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Document Management
Does it make any sense to use
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:10 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Document Management
Does it make any sense to use a U2 database to save scanned pdf's?
That is...
Does
.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:35 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Document Management
I would say its more dependent on the OS than the database
I would not store blobs directly in a U2 file. All it would take is one use of
ED and an inadvertent “file” to corrupt it. Using a plain WRITE statement to
put a blob into a type 1 or 19 file may well corrupt it.
An alternative using U2 is to use the sequential file statements of WRITEBLK
On 22/07/11 17:46, Holt, Jake wrote:
I would say SQL, etc. is no different than U2 when it comes to document
management. Its all the tools around the database that is going to help
get the job done for you. Use the database you know best :)
**
The filestream option in sql server is
Actually, Wol's right: the filestream option in SQL Server is just an entry
point into the regular Windows file system, so in effect it's no different
from using a type 19 directory.
Brian
**
The filestream option in sql server is designed specifically for this
task.
But how does it manage
On 22/07/11 18:11, Brian Leach wrote:
Actually, Wol's right: the filestream option in SQL Server is just an entry
point into the regular Windows file system, so in effect it's no different
from using a type 19 directory.
I didn't know that :-)
So if you're using a filesystem that's naff at
-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:10 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Document Management
Does it make any sense to use a U2 database to save scanned pdf's
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Document Management
Does it make any sense to use a U2 database to save scanned pdf's?
That is...
Does it make any sense to save small blobs in a U2 data base?
Would a Type 1 file be best?
Are there any advantages to using MS-SQL, MySQL
It looks like your responses, including mine here, are unanimous
- it's preferred to store blobs outside the DB and metadata
inside. I see no benefits to storing blobs in the DB and lots of
reasons not to do so. I wrote a blog a while back on signature
capture, which I implemented much like Rob
18 matches
Mail list logo
