Re: [U2] EDI anyone?

2004-10-22 Thread John_Appleyard
PROTECTED] Sent by:cc: (bcc: John Appleyard/BSDUK/AJG) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] EDI anyone

Re: [U2] EDI anyone?

2004-10-22 Thread Mark Johnson
and/or declining because so many 'partners' communicate directly with their own defined standard. My 1 cent. - Original Message - From: Bruce Nichol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:30 PM Subject: [U2] EDI anyone? Goo'day, Is there anybody out

RE: [U2] EDI anyone?

2004-10-22 Thread Glen B
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daly, Mark Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 6:19 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [U2] EDI anyone? I've just been doing a bunch of work for EDI clients. There is a lot of infrastructure in place that works well, and won't be replaced

[U2] EDI anyone?

2004-10-21 Thread Bruce Nichol
Goo'day, Is there anybody out there that can give a definitive answer to the future of EDI. Growing?Peaked? Stagnated? Declining? Regards, Bruce Nichol Talon Computer Services ALBURYNSW 2640 Australia Tel: +61 (0)411149636 Fax: +61 (0)260232119 If it ain't broke, fix it

Re: [U2] EDI anyone?

2004-10-21 Thread John Kent
are still getting edi work jak - Original Message - From: Bruce Nichol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:00 PM Subject: [U2] EDI anyone? Goo'day, Is there anybody out there that can give a definitive answer to the future of EDI. Growing