...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Can anyone explain this situation better. I've only ever used the @ to
simplify a few I-descriptors.
I have a dict item SIZE that is just the LEN(@RECORD)
So in this thread we've seen two EVAL solutions to a running total
LIST VOC SIZE EVAL @1+SIZE
LIST
From Martin's response, I'm guessing not for QM, either.
In QM, the @1, @2, etc variables are simply local variables within the I-type
expression. This gives us the useful advantage of
being able to nest compound I-type but does, as you suggest, prevent their use
to retain values across uses
: Re: [U2] Running total
Are you looking for @1? This gives a column containing running total (I
learned it from this list)
DICT AP F1 invoice value (A type or I type)
T1 running total I type: F2: @1 + F1
So, listing 3 items gives:
LIST AP TOTAL F1 KATE 10:26:30am 03
need ten more dict
items, one for each ?
Or am I reading this solution wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Don Robinson donr_w...@yahoo.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wed, Jul 3, 2013 6:54 am
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Kate,
This gives strange results
From: Kate Stanton k...@walstan.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Are you looking for @1? This gives a column containing running total (I
learned it from this list)
DICT AP F1
Can anyone explain this situation better. I've only ever used the @ to
simplify a few I-descriptors.
I have a dict item SIZE that is just the LEN(@RECORD)
So in this thread we've seen two EVAL solutions to a running total
LIST VOC SIZE EVAL @1+SIZE
LIST VOC SIZE EVAL SIZE + @2;@
In the first
...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Can anyone explain this situation better. I've only ever used the @ to
simplify a few I-descriptors.
I have a dict item SIZE that is just the LEN(@RECORD)
So in this thread we've seen two EVAL solutions to a running total
LIST VOC SIZE EVAL @1+SIZE
...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Can anyone explain this situation better. I've only ever used the @ to
simplify a few I-descriptors.
I have a dict item SIZE that is just the LEN(@RECORD)
So in this thread we've seen two EVAL solutions to a running total
LIST VOC SIZE EVAL @1+SIZE
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
I believe the expression in the second example is referred to as a compound
expression?
Can't put my finger on the exact documentation but I seem to recall that
compound expressions are broken up into parts (for want of a better term)
delimited
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: 02 July 2013 01:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Running total
Teach me again how to do a running total in a Access/Recall/English report.
I haven't done one in years, but I seem to recall that it's possible
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: 02 July 2013 01:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Running total
Teach me again how to do a running total in a Access/Recall/English report.
I haven't done one in years, but I seem to recall that it's possible
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
LIST NEWACC BYTES EVAL BYTES+@2;@
VOC. Bytes.. BYTES+@2;@
ADDX 47 47
CHDIR 53100
ENDPAGE 54154
LNUM 64218
___
U2
, July 02, 2013 8:49 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Hmmm.
Simpler than my approach but it fails with multivalues or with queries that
have other I-types in them.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun
List
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
LIST NEWACC BYTES EVAL BYTES+@2;@
VOC. Bytes.. BYTES+@2;@
ADDX 47 47
CHDIR 53100
ENDPAGE 54154
LNUM 64218
___
U2-Users mailing
@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 10:08 am
Subject: Re: [U2] Running total
Martin,
True, you might need mv-handling subrs for mv fields. Which are always
fun. (I hate to concede that correlatives might actually be better at
something, but I do wish there were a way to write a variation of an
I
: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Running total
Teach me again how to do a running total in a Access/Recall/English report.
I haven't done one in years, but I seem to recall that it's possible.
___
U2-Users
...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: 02 July 2013 01:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Running total
Teach me again how to do a running total in a Access/Recall/English report.
I haven't done one in years, but I seem
Teach me again how to do a running total in a Access/Recall/English report.
I haven't done one in years, but I seem to recall that it's possible.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Thanks, Kebbon. Why didn't I think about that?! Welcome to UD, where
stupid things trip me up every day. :-)
Bill
Kebbon Irwin said the following on 7/24/2009 4:53 AM:
I found that you had to take two steps, first an
I am sure we used to be able to do this using I-type, but I cannot remember
how.
Now we are using I-types again (not just ocreelatives), I want to be able to
show each item outstanding for an account, with a running balance.
Can anyone help?
I have been to the doc, and read about CALC and
Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 9:55 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Running total from UniVerse dict
I am sure we used to be able to do this using I-type, but I cannot
Hi Kate
I believe you are looking for the @ variables to solve your problem. I think
in the uv help they come under the @ in the same area as the screen commands
Regards
David Jordan
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 9:55 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Running total from UniVerse dict
I am sure we used to be able to do this using I-type, but I cannot remember
how.
Now we are using I-types again (not just
23 matches
Mail list logo
