Symeon:
I ran into this problem with multiple version of UD and mv.NET. I don't
think it mattered which version off the ".dll" was used for mv.NET. Our
current production is on UD 7.1.9 and our development is on UD 7.2.5.
We use 2.1.1.7211 on our UD 7.1.9 server. We do, however, make dbms
Hi - i am after a bit of advice from the group - i know it has been said
before to use the latest uniobjects .net dll but is that true regardless of
what udt version you have
i.e. i have one customer on udt 7.1.0 and they are using a dll at version
2.1.0.7137, I have another machine on the lat
Hi - i am after a bit of advice from the group - i know it has been said
before to use the latest uniobjects .net dll but is that true regardless of
what udt version you have
i.e. i have one customer on udt 7.1.0 and they are using a dll at version
2.1.0.7137, I have another machine on the lat
ts is never
> assigned.
>
> Brian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jacques G.
> > Sent: 13 July 2006 16:53
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: R
ent: 13 July 2006 16:53
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
>
> Hello,
>
> Anyone here know what causes this error ?
>
> System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds
> of the array.
>at IBMU2.UODOTNET.Un
Hello,
Anyone here know what causes this error ?
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the
bounds of the array.
at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.ReadHeaderLength()
at
IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.Receive(BinaryReader
aDataIn)
at
IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.ReadPacketInt
Thank you all for your responses.
I was hoping to avoid downloading the entire "Clients" package just for
this DLL, which as I recall was something over 100MB, but it's time for me
to get updated anyway. :) For me this is OK but I'm always hesitent to
recommend that an end-user upgrade the clien
%
managed code.
Cheers
KP
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:57 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
>
> Please forgive
>If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then
might
>there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are
loaded/running
>on the same system?
I was under the impression that the UO.NET dll is a native .net dll, not
a wrapper. There is no registration or COM componen
>"You just need to add UODOTNET.dll into the
> GAC on each
>workstation/system that uses UniObjects.NET. I'm not
> sure why IBM
>don't do this as part of their SDK install..."
I guess because using GAC is a pain in the backside if you want to use
one-click publish
lf Of "Tony
Gravagno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 12 July 2006 10:57
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Please forgive a quick post being made without appropriate prior
investigation. I'm hoping someone will have a quick an
Please forgive a quick post being made without appropriate prior
investigation. I'm hoping someone will have a quick answer for what might
otherwise take several hours of research.
I'm told there are two versions of UODOTNET.dll:
2.1.0.7137 and 2.1.0.7149
Where can we get the new build? We may
12 matches
Mail list logo
