earlier.
-John
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:08 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
In message
, John
Hester wri
In message
, John
Hester writes
There are also issues with UV dynamic files (don't know about UD)
because some of the file structure information is cached in memory and
not immediately flushed to disk.
This is no longer true.
Can't remember which IBM'er it was, but it was confirmed that UV
LifeKeeper for replication.
-John
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:53 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Do you replicate every fil
AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Brad and John,
[ad]
Since, we work with both UD and UV we found replication is not the same.
We wrote a simple Java program that runs using UOJ and does the
replication to one or many sites. The software can even replicate f
at soon UD and UV will be using the same replication engine.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:01 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replica
Do you replicate every file on the server ?
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, John Hester wrote:
> From: John Hester
> Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
> To: "U2 Users List"
> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 1:00 AM
> Brad is right. You can get
> bitten by
eport work files.
-John
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:12 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Double-Take replicates byte by
Double-Take replicates byte by byte.
--- On Tue, 12/15/09, BraDav wrote:
> From: BraDav
> Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
> To: "U2 Users List"
> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 10:56 PM
> Someone needs to write an i/o agent,
> so U2 can be used with
AM
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, BraDav wrote:
From: BraDav
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
To: "U2 Users List"
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 8:33 AM
Kevin,
I would not use replication for U2 for 6x.
drives with a 0,1
configuration sequentially - which is fast. However, RFS can take 25% to
50% of resources, so have a fast box!!!
- Original Message -
From: "David Wolverton "
To: "'U2 Users List'"
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:25 PM
Subject:
uot;
To: "'U2 Users List'"
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Replication is QUITE useful at 7.1.20 and later I know -- we have lots of
people using it now!
Before this time, it had issues with large records, multiple over
Awesome, great feedback my friends. Appreciate it very much.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:33 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
Replication is QUITE useful at 7.1.20 and later I know -- we have lots of
people using it now!
Before this time, it had issues with large records, multiple overwrites one
the same key, etc. At 7.1.20 they also improved the monitoring.
Don't bother at less than 7.1.20 IMHO
David W.
__
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, BraDav wrote:
> From: BraDav
> Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
> To: "U2 Users List"
> Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 8:33 AM
> Kevin,
>
> I would not use replication for U2 for 6x. I
rks in UD and scales, and what doesn't. To write one's own
takes time and is expensive. I think that using mirrored drives is
better!!! RFS???
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin King"
To: "U2 Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:22 PM
Su
-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:23 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Is replication solid and functional in Unidata 6,1? Anyone using it with
roaring
Is replication solid and functional in Unidata 6,1? Anyone using it with
roaring success?
-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
18 matches
Mail list logo
