Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts? experts?

2007-06-14 Thread mgolden
I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell PowerEdge 1950, with two Xeon Woodcrests (Core 2 Duo-based). Each machine has 16G RAM and similar hard drive configurations. Both run Windows

Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts? experts?

2007-06-14 Thread Gabriel Green
16G is supported on x64 (and I suppose Itanium) versions only. 32-bit versions are limited to 4G. On 6/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which performed much better with UV and in general than my brand

RE: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts?

2007-06-14 Thread Glen Batchelor
Subject: Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts? Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a statement for those a little more familiar with server architecture I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s

Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts?

2007-06-13 Thread Gabriel Green
Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a statement for those a little more familiar with server architecture I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell