Johnson
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:52 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Pro's/cons of keeping UV maint/support contract
current (paid)
I too have QM loaded as an alternative to D3 for any single user deals.
I
got frustrated with it as I'm not a Pr1me descendant. B
One thing not mentioned so far is that if you want to (or have to)
upgrade your O/S, you may very well have to upgrade the database as
well. I don't know how this applies to "big iron" HPUX or AIX systems,
but for Windows or Linux hosted systems this can be a big deal. Older
versions of Red Hat, fo
The personal edition would not apply as it would be used for commerical
purposes, which is explicitly prohibited.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8:51:46 AM 04/14/2005 >>>
[snipped...]
Isn't there a UV-lite or personal version that may apply? Notice that we're
offering up lesser supported items as a possib
original poster's management position.
Also, perhaps these regulations may not apply.
- Original Message -
From: "Don Kibbey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] Pro's/cons of keeping UV maint/support contract current
(paid
Why on earth would a company support anything without a revenue
stream? Support pays for the people required to provide it. It's
great that a small to mid size business can get 10-20 years out of an
IT investment. But, they should be prepared to make a big move when
the ole mini finally spirals
something and why should we give it away". Sort of a
displaced value system. You like your apps and we're going to tap into that
friendship.
my 2 cents.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A. Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 6:29 AM
yes, I know of openqm, I have it loaded here someplace, just lack of
time to play. My understanding at this point is it currently supports
the general Prime Information syntax
Rich
Bruce Nichol wrote:
Goo'day, all.
At 04:44 14/04/05 -0400, you wrote:
Mark's comments prompt me to ask.
Would the r
Goo'day, all.
At 04:44 14/04/05 -0400, you wrote:
Mark's comments prompt me to ask.
Would the re-purchasing of the licenses be covered under a general
business interruption insurance policy if a catastrophe happened?
Rich
Er, I don't know quite how to say this, so ..
Have you checked QM
Mark's comments prompt me to ask.
Would the re-purchasing of the licenses be covered under a general
business interruption insurance policy if a catastrophe happened?
Rich
Mark Johnson wrote:
I'm gonna throw in my 4 cents on this one.
I can understand the frustration of writing a big check for OS
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Pro's/cons of keeping UV maint/support contract current
(paid)
> I believe it is IBM current policy that if your maintenance lapses, you
are
> required to repurchase your license to be able t
I'm gonna throw in my 4 cents on this one.
I can understand the frustration of writing a big check for OS support over
the years on a stable system. Many of my clients that were native and
converted to D3 reluctantly paid the first year's required OS support and
sort of balked afterwards. It does
I believe it is IBM current policy that if your maintenance lapses, you are
required to repurchase your license to be able to reinstate maintenance
which is required for any upgrades. Obviously somewhat severe but intended
as so.
I suppose you would need to weigh the savings over expected time
12 matches
Mail list logo
