Hey all,
Where on IBM's massive web site can I find what was fixed on what
version of universe?
This thread got me wondering if some weird issues I have seen have
already been fixed on a new versions of universe (we are running on AIX
if that matters)
As well as what new features have been ad
This is on 10.2.6, released Aug 2007.
Issue 7659 was fixed in 10.1.14, released Aug 2005.
You'd think the fix would be in 10.2.6, too, but maybe it has reared
its ugly head again.
My description is not quite the same, but I am on HP. No select
involved. Executing a PORT.STATUS from another sessi
atform and has been fixed.
This might be of help - does it match?
Regtards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eastwood
Sent: 13 February 2008 15:10
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] SLEEP 60 slept only 53 second
ary 13, 2008 11:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] SLEEP 60 slept only 53 seconds, or else TIMEDATE() is
wrong
If you had a continue or exit in the code above line 439, it would speed
up the interval by skipping the sleep on line 439, and depending on what
that code was doin
If you had a continue or exit in the code above line 439, it would speed up
the interval by skipping the sleep on line 439, and depending on what that
code was doing, it could take a coincidental 53 seconds.
But you said there was none, and there are no double "top loop" lines, so
that situation i
-Original Message-
From: Mark Eastwood
> I had a similar experience several years ago (10.0.?/Windows).
> What I suspect (but never proved) was happening was when I ran
> PORT.STATUS, it "touched" the sleeping phantom process and woke it up.
> It was of little significance to me, and never
I had a similar experience several years ago (10.0.?/Windows).
What I suspect (but never proved) was happening was when I ran
PORT.STATUS, it "touched" the sleeping phantom process and woke it up.
It was of little significance to me, and never encounter on other boxes,
so I never pursued. You shoul
I'm going with the vote for a timeserver sync that someone else posted.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> Silly question perhaps, but are there any CONTINUE or EXIT statements
> in the parts you left out?
No, but think about it: even if there were, it could only SLOW DOWN not
SPEED UP the interval between executions of CRT TIMEDATE().
If you look at the line numbers, you'll see that there are no
Silly question perhaps, but are there any CONTINUE or EXIT statements in the
parts you left out?
When I worked on an AS400 about 10 years ago we had to have the time crystal
replaced because it was losing 2 minutes a month. Do computers still have
those?
-- Louie in Seattle
---
u2-users mail
10 matches
Mail list logo