Symeon:
I ran into this problem with multiple version of UD and mv.NET. I don't
think it mattered which version off the ".dll" was used for mv.NET. Our
current production is on UD 7.1.9 and our development is on UD 7.2.5.
We use 2.1.1.7211 on our UD 7.1.9 server. We do, however, make dbms
ts is never
> assigned.
>
> Brian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jacques G.
> > Sent: 13 July 2006 16:53
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: R
ent: 13 July 2006 16:53
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
>
> Hello,
>
> Anyone here know what causes this error ?
>
> System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds
> of the array.
>at IBMU2.UODOTNET.Un
Hello,
Anyone here know what causes this error ?
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the
bounds of the array.
at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.ReadHeaderLength()
at
IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.Receive(BinaryReader
aDataIn)
at
IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.ReadPacketInt
Thank you all for your responses.
I was hoping to avoid downloading the entire "Clients" package just for
this DLL, which as I recall was something over 100MB, but it's time for me
to get updated anyway. :) For me this is OK but I'm always hesitent to
recommend that an end-user upgrade the clien
Tony,
As far as the two versions co-existing goes, it is possible, even in the
same application (not simply however). If this is for different
applications, then just make sure the correct assembly is in the bin
directory.
And finally, UO.NET is not a wrapper around the COM components; it is 100%
>If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then
might
>there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are
loaded/running
>on the same system?
I was under the impression that the UO.NET dll is a native .net dll, not
a wrapper. There is no registration or COM componen
>"You just need to add UODOTNET.dll into the
> GAC on each
>workstation/system that uses UniObjects.NET. I'm not
> sure why IBM
>don't do this as part of their SDK install..."
I guess because using GAC is a pain in the backside if you want to use
one-click publish
Currently I only have 7149 in the GAC but you should be able to have
another version alongside.
This build came with Clients for UniVerse 10.1B, which is downloadable
from IBM U2 - trials & betas.
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/preconfig.jsp?id=2005-03
-31+14%3A
