RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-29 Thread Claus Derlien
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 12:04 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux Karl, I know that. I think you are missing the point of my question. The kernel that is on the grid

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-29 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
, 2005 6:47 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux I didnt realize that the libc ver was in the kernel numbering/naming scheme. So, on my system (RedHat EL AS), I did the following; [EMAIL PROTECTED] anthony]$ rpm -qa | grep libc glibc-common

Re: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread karlp
The first 2 numbers (2.4) are the critical ones. IBM has to put the whole kernel on which they tested so they are legally covered, just in case. Though I doubt it will be an issue, it could and they have to cover their bases. If your kernel is 2.4.18-14 (Redhat v8.0) or 2.4.20-8 (Redhat v9) then

Re: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread Don Kibbey
Both myself and others on this list have been able to get UniVerse to function within several different kernel revisions and distributions. That said, I can understand why even IBM would not want to get into the habit of testing their software with all the various distributions and kernel

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:38 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux The first 2 numbers (2.4) are the critical ones. IBM has to put the whole kernel on which

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:01 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux Both myself and others on this list have been able to get UniVerse to function within several different kernel revisions and distributions. That said

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread karlp
: Re: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux The first 2 numbers (2.4) are the critical ones. IBM has to put the whole kernel on which they tested so they are legally covered, just in case. Though I doubt it will be an issue, it could and they have to cover their bases. If your kernel

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
? Anthony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux No kernel is a 'Redhat' kernel. They are all the property

RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux

2005-04-28 Thread karlp
: Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Availability Matrix - Linux No kernel is a 'Redhat' kernel. They are all the property of Linus Torvalds. Redhat uses which ever kernel they want based on the functionality they want to include in a given