37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain
copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for
CREATE.INDEX to work correctly.
Next question... To avoid having to
st'
Subject: RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
Except it's not a strange reason. The whole point of a distributed file
is that any part of the file can be treated as a file in its own right,
so it needs its own dictionary.
And given that MV makes no distinction between data and dict p
Sent by: cc:
u2-users-bounces@Subject: Secondary
Indices on Distributed Files
oliver.com
02/09/2004 12:08
PM
cc:
u2-users-bounces@Subject: Secondary Indices on
Distributed Files
oliv
u2-users-bounces@ Subject: Secondary Indices on
Distributed Files
a LIST of that field, that would explain your problem.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 17:08
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files
I've go
I've got a Distributed File that I'm trying to create indices on. Four of
the fields are D-Types, and CREATE.INDEX runs fine for them. Three fields
though, are I-Types (that are compiled and working), where CREATE.INDEX
gives the following error:
I-descriptor must be compiled before execu