RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread Hona, David S
37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files For some strange reason, the DICT of each Part File needed to contain copies of the I-Types from the Distributed File's DICT in order for CREATE.INDEX to work correctly. Next question... To avoid having to

RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
st' Subject: RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files Except it's not a strange reason. The whole point of a distributed file is that any part of the file can be treated as a file in its own right, so it needs its own dictionary. And given that MV makes no distinction between data and dict p

RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
Sent by: cc: u2-users-bounces@Subject: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files oliver.com 02/09/2004 12:08 PM

Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread gcanedy
cc: u2-users-bounces@Subject: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files oliv

Re: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread gcanedy
u2-users-bounces@ Subject: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

RE: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
a LIST of that field, that would explain your problem. Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2004 17:08 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Secondary Indices on Distributed Files I've go

Secondary Indices on Distributed Files

2004-02-09 Thread gcanedy
I've got a Distributed File that I'm trying to create indices on. Four of the fields are D-Types, and CREATE.INDEX runs fine for them. Three fields though, are I-Types (that are compiled and working), where CREATE.INDEX gives the following error: I-descriptor must be compiled before execu